Saye J D, Griffith B C
School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-3360.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Oct;76(4):295-305.
The National Library of Medicine's (NLM) monographic resources in the medical behavioral sciences (MBS) were examined to assess NLM's ability to support the needs of researchers writing in this area. A sample of 239 representative monographs derived from citations in MBS-related articles published in 61 journals in 1981 were evaluated. These monographs were limited to works published between 1978 and 1981, inclusive. The subject distribution of the sample included fourteen of the twenty-one main classes in the LC classification, although BF (psychology), H (social sciences), and R (medicine) constituted 80.3% of the sample. The study revealed that NLM held 48.5% of the sample. The holdings of ten research medical libraries, including six of the seven regional medical libraries, were also evaluated in order to gauge NLM's ability to support that element of the medical library network. The holding rates of these libraries ranged widely (9.6% to 36%), although NLM was found to have far more extensive holdings overall, and when assessed against classes BF, H, and R. Overall, NLM could have supplied from 28.8% to 44.5% of the monographs not held by the medical libraries. In only a few cases were the ten medical libraries able to provide access to monographs not held by NLM. The findings of the study indicate that, regardless of NLM's indication of support to the MBS area, the holdings of more general research and academic libraries are essential to support the monograph needs of MBS researchers.
对美国国立医学图书馆(NLM)在医学行为科学(MBS)方面的专著资源进行了调查,以评估NLM满足该领域研究人员写作需求的能力。对从1981年发表在61种期刊上的与MBS相关文章的参考文献中选取的239本代表性专著进行了评估。这些专著限于1978年至1981年(含)期间出版的作品。样本的主题分布涵盖了美国国会图书馆分类法21个主要类别中的14个,尽管BF(心理学)、H(社会科学)和R(医学)占样本的80.3%。研究表明,NLM收藏了样本中的48.5%。还对包括七个地区医学图书馆中的六个在内的十家研究型医学图书馆的馆藏进行了评估,以衡量NLM支持医学图书馆网络这一环节的能力。这些图书馆的馆藏率差异很大(9.6%至36%),不过总体而言,NLM的馆藏更为广泛,并且在按BF、H和R类别评估时也是如此。总体而言,NLM能够提供医学图书馆未收藏的专著的28.8%至44.5%。只有少数情况下,这十家医学图书馆能够提供NLM未收藏的专著的访问途径。研究结果表明,无论NLM对MBS领域的支持情况如何,更综合的研究型和学术型图书馆的馆藏对于满足MBS研究人员的专著需求至关重要。