Hematology Division, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Am J Hematol. 2020 Jul;95(7):759-765. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25797. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is feasible and effective in selected older patients with Multiple Myeloma, but specific criteria for evaluating ASCT eligibility in elderly patients are lacking. We evaluated 131 patients aged 65-75 considered for ASCT at our center: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and IMWG frailty score were obtained at diagnosis, but the intensity of treatment was left to physician's choice. The scores and age's impact on outcome was analyzed: 85 patients were judged transplant eligible, whereas 46 patients received a less intensive treatment (median follow up 27 months). No patients classified as frail had been considered eligible to ASCT with a worse outcome compared to fit and unfit patients (median PFS (progression free survival): 7.9 vs 32.9 and 29.6 months; P < .001). PFS was superior in the ASCT group (35.6 vs 19.9 months, P .013). In the ASCT group, PFS was better in patients aged 65-69 years than in patients ≥70 (51.5 vs 27.7 months, P.004). Indeed, in unfit patients aged ≥70 the PFS of the ASCT group was comparable to NO ASCT group (18 vs 27 months, P = .33) whereas in unfit patients aged 65-69 PFS was superior in the ASCT group: 43.3 vs 18.4 months, P .01. ISS III and impaired functional status independently affected PFS in a multivariate analysis (P .011 and P .006). While CCI and HCT-CI did not predict different outcome in ASCT patients, the IMWG frailty score would be of help in identifying unfit patients aged 70-75, whose outcome with ASCT selected by clinical judgment was no better than with less intensive treatments.
自体干细胞移植(ASCT)在选择的老年多发性骨髓瘤患者中是可行和有效的,但缺乏评估老年患者 ASCT 资格的具体标准。我们评估了在我们中心考虑进行 ASCT 的 131 名年龄在 65-75 岁的患者:在诊断时获得 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、造血细胞移植合并症指数(HCT-CI)和 IMWG 虚弱评分,但治疗的强度由医生选择。分析了评分和年龄对结果的影响:85 名患者被判断为移植合格,而 46 名患者接受了强度较低的治疗(中位随访 27 个月)。与 fit 和 unfit 患者相比,没有被归类为虚弱的患者被认为有资格接受 ASCT,预后更差(中位无进展生存期(PFS):7.9 与 32.9 和 29.6 个月;P <.001)。ASCT 组的 PFS 更优(35.6 与 19.9 个月,P.013)。在 ASCT 组中,年龄在 65-69 岁的患者的 PFS 优于年龄≥70 岁的患者(51.5 与 27.7 个月,P.004)。实际上,在年龄≥70 岁的不适合的患者中,ASCT 组的 PFS 与无 ASCT 组相当(18 与 27 个月,P =.33),而在年龄在 65-69 岁的不适合的患者中,ASCT 组的 PFS 更优:43.3 与 18.4 个月,P.01。ISS III 和功能状态受损在多变量分析中独立影响 PFS(P.011 和 P.006)。虽然 CCI 和 HCT-CI 不能预测 ASCT 患者的不同结局,但 IMWG 虚弱评分有助于识别年龄在 70-75 岁的不适合的患者,这些患者的预后与临床判断选择的 ASCT 治疗无差异,不如接受强度较低的治疗。