• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瓣膜植入术后预测假体-患者不匹配指数有效开口面积图的谬论。

The fallacy of indexed effective orifice area charts to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch after prosthesis implantation.

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands.

Global Clinical Operations, Coronary and Structural Heart, Medtronic, Endepolsdomein 5, 6229 GW, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):1116-1122. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa044.

DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa044
PMID:32243493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7971169/
Abstract

AIMS

Indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) charts are used to determine the likelihood of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim of this study is to validate whether these EOAi charts, based on echocardiographic normal reference values, can accurately predict PPM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Pivotal Trial, 986 patients with aortic valve stenosis/regurgitation underwent AVR with an Avalus valve. Patients were randomly split (50:50) into training and test sets. The mean measured EOAs for each valve size from the training set were used to create an Avalus EOAi chart. This chart was subsequently used to predict PPM in the test set and measures of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value) were assessed. PPM was defined by an EOAi ≤0.85 cm2/m2, and severe PPM was defined as EOAi ≤0.65 cm2/m2. The reference values obtained from the training set ranged from 1.27 cm2 for size 19 mm up to 1.81 cm2 for size 27 mm. The test set had an incidence of 66% of PPM and 24% of severe PPM. The EOAi chart inaccurately predicted PPM in 30% of patients and severe PPM in 22% of patients. For the prediction of PPM, the sensitivity was 87% and the specificity 37%. For the prediction of severe PPM, the sensitivity was 13% and the specificity 98%.

CONCLUSION

The use of echocardiographic normal reference values for EOAi charts to predict PPM is unreliable due to the large proportion of misclassifications.

摘要

目的

指数有效瓣口面积(EOAi)图用于确定主动脉瓣置换(AVR)后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配(PPM)的可能性。本研究旨在验证基于超声心动图正常参考值的这些 EOAi 图是否可以准确预测 PPM。

方法和结果

在 PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt(PERIGON)关键性试验中,986 例主动脉瓣狭窄/反流患者接受了 Avalus 瓣膜的 AVR。患者随机分为训练组和测试组(50:50)。从训练组中每个瓣膜尺寸的平均测量 EOAs 用于创建 Avalus EOAi 图。随后,该图表用于预测测试集中的 PPM,并评估诊断准确性的度量(敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值)。EOAi≤0.85cm2/m2 定义为 PPM,EOAi≤0.65cm2/m2 定义为严重 PPM。从训练组获得的参考值范围从 19mm 尺寸的 1.27cm2 到 27mm 尺寸的 1.81cm2。测试组 PPM 的发生率为 66%,严重 PPM 的发生率为 24%。EOAi 图不准确地预测了 30%的患者发生 PPM 和 22%的患者发生严重 PPM。对于 PPM 的预测,敏感性为 87%,特异性为 37%。对于严重 PPM 的预测,敏感性为 13%,特异性为 98%。

结论

由于分类错误的比例较大,使用超声心动图正常参考值的 EOAi 图来预测 PPM 是不可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/33f3edd1db42/jeaa044f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/acfcb086b877/jeaa044f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/3cba05736f7b/jeaa044f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/33f3edd1db42/jeaa044f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/acfcb086b877/jeaa044f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/3cba05736f7b/jeaa044f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b61f/7971169/33f3edd1db42/jeaa044f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The fallacy of indexed effective orifice area charts to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch after prosthesis implantation.瓣膜植入术后预测假体-患者不匹配指数有效开口面积图的谬论。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):1116-1122. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa044.
2
Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement.经指数有效瓣口面积对主动脉瓣置换术后中期心脏相关死亡率的影响。
Heart. 2010 Jun;96(11):865-71. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.177220. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
3
Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch.为什么索引有效开口面积的分类不能作为假体-患者不匹配的分类依据。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep;164(3):822-829.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测有效瓣口面积在确定患者-人工瓣膜不匹配发生率方面的准确性。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jan;36(1):191-196. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15148. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用预测与测量的有效瓣口面积指数对人工假体-患者不匹配的重新分类。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):11-20. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235.
6
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.PARTNER 2 试验和注册研究中主动脉瓣置换术后假体-患者不匹配。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1466-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.
7
Comprehensive hemodynamic performance and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the St. Jude Medical Trifecta bioprosthetic aortic valve.圣犹达医疗Trifecta生物人工主动脉瓣的综合血流动力学性能及患者-人工瓣膜不匹配发生率
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Jul;23(4):516-23.
8
[Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with small aortic annulus; is the indexed effective orifice area important?].[老年小主动脉瓣环患者的主动脉瓣置换术;体表面积标准化有效瓣口面积重要吗?]
Kyobu Geka. 2006 Apr;59(4):329-35.
9
Patient-prosthesis mismatch has no influence on in-hospital mortality after aortic valve replacement.人工瓣膜-患者不匹配对主动脉瓣置换术后的院内死亡率没有影响。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95 Suppl 8:S64-70.
10
Relationship between prosthesis-patient mismatch and pro-brain natriuretic peptides after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配与脑钠肽前体之间的关系。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):171-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch and Aortic Root Enlargement: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes.人工瓣膜-患者不匹配与主动脉根部扩大:适应证、技术及结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 1;10(9):373. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090373.
2
Early and late effects of aortic root enlargement: Results from the Pericardial Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Pivotal Trial: A multicenter, prospective clinical trial.主动脉根部扩大的早期和晚期影响:心包外科主动脉瓣置换关键试验的结果:一项多中心前瞻性临床试验。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Dec 6;13:54-74. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.11.013. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Surgical aortic valve replacement with a stented pericardial bioprosthesis: 5-year outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Incremental Risk of Annular Enlargement: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.环形扩大的增量风险:一项多机构队列研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1752-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.118. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Characteristics of surgical prosthetic heart valves and problems around labelling: a document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Valve Labelling Task Force.外科人工心脏瓣膜的特征和标签问题:欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)-胸外科医师学会(STS)-美国胸外科医师学会(AATS)瓣膜标签工作组的文件。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(6):1025-1036. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz034.
3
带支架心包生物瓣的主动脉瓣置换术:5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;62(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac374.
Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient-prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of 108 182 patients.
外科主动脉瓣置换术和患者-假体不匹配:108182 例患者的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jul 1;56(1):44-54. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy466.
4
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的假体-患者不匹配:来自 STS/ACC TVT 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2701-2711. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
5
Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Transcatheter Valve Function.经导管正常瓣膜功能的综合超声心动图评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
One-year outcomes associated with a novel stented bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis.新型带支架牛心包主动脉生物瓣的一年随访结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1368-1377.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.171. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
The Incidence and Consequence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的发生率和后果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis.一种新型带支架主动脉瓣生物假体的安全性、有效性和血液动力学性能。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):425-431. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx066.
9
Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging.人工心脏瓣膜成像评估建议:欧洲心血管影像学会报告,获中国超声心动图学会、美洲超声心动图学会及巴西心血管影像学会认可。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;17(6):589-90. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew025. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement: Effect on Long-Term Survival.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配:对长期生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Feb 26.