• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用预测与测量的有效瓣口面积指数对人工假体-患者不匹配的重新分类。

Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area.

机构信息

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec- Université Laval/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec city, Québec G1V-4G5, Canada.

Cardiology Department, Expert Valve Center, Henri Mondor ho spital, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):11-20. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235.

DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235
PMID:32995865
Abstract

AIMS

The objective was to compare the incidence and impact on outcomes of measured (PPMM) vs. predicted (PPMP) prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutives patients who underwent TAVR between 2007 and 2018 were included. Effective orifice area (EOA) was measured by Doppler-echocardiography using the continuity equation and predicted according to the normal reference for each model and size of valve. PPM was defined using EOA indexed (EOAi) to body surface area as moderate if ≤0.85 cm2/m2 and severe if ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2 (respectively, ≤ 0.70 and ≤ 0.55 cm2/m2 if body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). The outcome endpoints were high residual gradient (≥20 mmHg) and the composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospital readmission for heart failure at 1 year. Overall, 1088 patients underwent a TAVR (55% male, age 79.1 ± 8.4 years, and STS score 6.6 ± 4.7%); balloon-expandable device was used in 83%. Incidence of moderate (10% vs. 27%) and severe (1% vs. 17%) PPM was markedly lower when defined by predicted vs. measured EOAi (P < 0.001). Balloon-expandable device implantation (OR: 1.90, P = 0.029) and valve-in-valve procedure (n = 118; OR: 3.21, P < 0.001) were the main factors associated with PPM occurrence. Compared with measured PPM, predicted PPM showed stronger association with high residual gradient. Severe measured or predicted PPM was not associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of the predicted EOAi reclassifies the majority of patients with PPM to no PPM following TAVR. Compared with measured PPM, predicted PPM had stronger association with haemodynamic outcomes, while both methods were not associated with clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后测量的(PPMM)与预测的(PPMP)人工假体-患者不匹配的发生率和对结局的影响。

方法和结果

纳入了 2007 年至 2018 年间接受 TAVR 的所有连续患者。有效瓣口面积(EOA)通过多普勒超声心动图使用连续方程进行测量,并根据每个瓣膜模型和大小的正常参考值进行预测。人工假体-患者不匹配(PPM)定义为 EOA 指数(EOAi)与体表面积的比值,如果≤0.85cm2/m2 为中度,如果≤0.65cm2/m2 为重度(如果 BMI≥30kg/m2,则分别为≤0.70 和≤0.55cm2/m2)。研究终点为残余梯度高(≥20mmHg)和 1 年时心血管死亡率和因心力衰竭再次住院的复合终点。总体而言,1088 例患者接受了 TAVR(55%为男性,年龄 79.1±8.4 岁,STS 评分 6.6±4.7%);83%使用球囊扩张装置。与测量的 EOAi 相比,以预测的 EOAi 定义时,中度(10%比 27%)和重度(1%比 17%)人工假体-患者不匹配的发生率明显降低(P<0.001)。球囊扩张装置植入(OR:1.90,P=0.029)和瓣中瓣术(n=118;OR:3.21,P<0.001)是 PPM 发生的主要相关因素。与测量的 PPM 相比,预测的 PPM 与残余梯度高的相关性更强。严重的测量或预测的 PPM 与临床结局无关。

结论

在 TAVR 后,预测的 EOAi 的使用将大多数 PPM 患者重新分类为无 PPM。与测量的 PPM 相比,预测的 PPM 与血液动力学结局的相关性更强,而这两种方法与临床结局均无关。

相似文献

1
Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用预测与测量的有效瓣口面积指数对人工假体-患者不匹配的重新分类。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):11-20. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235.
2
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.PARTNER 2 试验和注册研究中主动脉瓣置换术后假体-患者不匹配。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1466-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.
3
Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测有效瓣口面积在确定患者-人工瓣膜不匹配发生率方面的准确性。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jan;36(1):191-196. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15148. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Long-term outcomes of measured and predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后测量和预测的人工假体-患者不匹配的长期结果。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Nov 17;19(9):746-756. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00456.
5
Correlation between measured and predicted mismatch with valve hemodynamics in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A sex-based analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中测量与预测的瓣膜血流动力学不匹配之间的相关性:基于性别的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;102(3):505-512. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30764. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
7
CT-Defined Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Downgrades Frequency and Severity, and Demonstrates No Association With Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.CT 定义的假体-患者不匹配降级频率和严重程度,并且在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后与不良结局无关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1578-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis.使用爱德华兹SAPIEN™人工瓣膜经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;61(5):414-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311534. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement achieves similar predicted effective orifice area to surgical aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄中达到与外科主动脉瓣置换术相似的预测有效瓣口面积。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Sep;66:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials.外科主动脉瓣置换术后患者-假体不匹配:PARTNER 试验分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Jun;117(6):1164-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.023. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Flow Status-Based Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用球囊扩张瓣膜患者中基于血流状态的预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配情况
Struct Heart. 2024 Dec 6;9(4):100379. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100379. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Clinical Impact of Flow-Adjusted Transprosthetic Pressure Gradient After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后流量调整跨瓣压差的临床影响
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Jul 26;3(1):42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.008. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Sex-related differences in prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement and long-term outcomes.
主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜与患者不匹配的性别差异及长期预后
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jun 23;46(24):2320-2332. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf076.
4
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch: Current State of Evidence.人工瓣膜-患者不匹配:证据现状
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Feb 10;27(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02212-z.
5
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus: A meta-analysis with reconstructed time to event data.主动脉瓣环较小的主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项采用事件发生时间数据重建的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Dec 31;56:101578. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101578. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术中的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 31;13(3):211-223. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0166. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
7
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years.人工主动脉瓣置换术后假体-患者不匹配的影响:122989 例患者 592952 患者年的重建时间事件数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e033176. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033176. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
8
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch and Aortic Root Enlargement: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes.人工瓣膜-患者不匹配与主动脉根部扩大:适应证、技术及结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 1;10(9):373. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090373.
9
Improved Early Outcomes in Women Undergoing Aortic Valve Interventions.接受主动脉瓣干预治疗的女性早期结局得到改善。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5749. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175749.
10
Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.INSPIRIS RESILIA主动脉瓣的中期临床和超声心动图结果:与Magna Ease的回顾性比较。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad117.