Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108957. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108957. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To evaluate the in vivo feasibility of a multibolus contrast agent (CA) injection protocol with a reduced CA volume for thoraco-abdominal CT angiography (CTA) and to compare it to a single-bolus CA injection protocol.
63 patients who underwent CTA with the multibolus protocol (60 ml CA) were divided in two groups either without (group 1, n = 48) or with (group 2, n = 15) aortic dissection. The aortic contrast enhancement was measured in group 1 using manual ROI analysis (10 segments), as well as semi-automated linear attenuation profiles. A subgroup (n = 18) of group 1, who also underwent imaging with the single-bolus protocol (94 ml CA), was used to compare both protocols. In group 2, differences in attenuation of the true and the false lumen for both the single- and the multibolus protocol were assessed with ROI attenuation measurements in both lumina. Comparisons were made using Wilcoxon test.
Average attenuation was above 200 HU for 98 % of cases using the multibolus protocol. There was superior contrast homogeneity for the multibolus protocol with a lower standard deviation of attenuation values along the length of the scan (p = 0.003), while average attenuation was higher for the single-bolus protocol (p = 0.002). Prolonged enhancement plateau lead to a more uniform opacification of the true and the false lumen in patients with aortic dissection using the multibolus protocol (p = 0.012).
The multibolus protocol in thoraco-abdominal CTA is feasible in patients. It shows consistently high arterial enhancement with superior contrast homogeneity compared to a single-bolus protocol in patients with and without aortic dissection.
评估一种多剂量对比剂(CA)注射方案的体内可行性,该方案减少了用于胸腹 CT 血管造影(CTA)的 CA 量,并将其与单剂量 CA 注射方案进行比较。
63 例接受多剂量方案(60ml CA)CTA 的患者分为两组,一组无(组 1,n=48),一组有(组 2,n=15)主动脉夹层。组 1 采用手动 ROI 分析(10 个节段)和半自动线性衰减曲线测量主动脉对比增强,还对组 1 中的一个亚组(n=18)行单剂量方案(94ml CA)成像,用于比较两种方案。在组 2 中,使用 ROI 衰减测量评估真腔和假腔的衰减差异,分别用于单剂量和多剂量方案。使用 Wilcoxon 检验进行比较。
多剂量方案平均衰减>200HU,占 98%。多剂量方案的对比均匀性更好,扫描长度上衰减值的标准差更低(p=0.003),而单剂量方案的平均衰减更高(p=0.002)。增强平台延长导致多剂量方案中主动脉夹层患者的真腔和假腔更均匀显影(p=0.012)。
胸腹 CTA 中多剂量方案在患者中是可行的。与无主动脉夹层的患者和有主动脉夹层的患者的单剂量方案相比,它显示出一致的高动脉增强,具有更好的对比均匀性。