Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland, USA.
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 May 19;86(11). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00018-20.
Anthropogenic activity impacts stream ecosystems, resulting in a loss of diversity and ecosystem function; however, little is known about the response of aquatic microbial communities to changes in land use. Here, microbial communities were characterized in 82 headwater streams across a gradient of urban and agricultural land uses using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and compared to a rich data set of physicochemical variables and traditional benthic invertebrate indicators. Microbial diversity and community structures differed among watersheds with high agricultural, urban, and forested land uses, and community structure differed in streams classified as being in good, fair, poor, and very poor condition using benthic invertebrate indicators. Microbial community similarity decayed with geodesic distance across the study region but not with environmental distance. Stream community respiration rates ranged from 21.7 to 1,570 mg O m day and 31.9 to 3,670 mg O m day for water column and sediments, respectively, and correlated with nutrients associated with anthropogenic influence and microbial community structure. Nitrous oxide (NO) concentrations ranged from 0.22 to 4.41 μg NO liter; NO concentration was negatively correlated with forested land use and was positively correlated with dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations. Our findings suggest that stream microbial communities are impacted by watershed land use and can potentially be used to assess ecosystem health. Stream ecosystems are frequently impacted by changes in watershed land use, resulting in altered hydrology, increased pollutant and nutrient loads, and habitat degradation. Macroinvertebrates and fish are strongly affected by changes in stream conditions and are commonly used in biotic indices to assess ecosystem health. Similarly, microbes respond to environmental stressors, and changes in community composition alter key ecosystem processes. The response of microbes to habitat degradation and their role in global biogeochemical cycles provide an opportunity to use microbes as a monitoring tool. Here, we identify stream microbes that respond to watershed urbanization and agricultural development and demonstrate that microbial diversity and community structure can be used to assess stream conditions and ecosystem functioning.
人为活动对溪流生态系统造成影响,导致生物多样性和生态系统功能丧失;然而,人们对于水生微生物群落对土地利用变化的响应知之甚少。本研究采用 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序技术,在城市和农业土地利用梯度上的 82 条源头溪流中对微生物群落进行了特征描述,并与理化变量和传统底栖无脊椎动物指标的丰富数据集进行了比较。高农业、城市和森林土地利用的流域之间微生物多样性和群落结构存在差异,并且根据底栖无脊椎动物指标将溪流分为良好、一般、较差和很差的条件时,群落结构也存在差异。微生物群落相似性随地理距离的增加而衰减,但不受环境距离的影响。溪流群落呼吸速率范围分别为水柱 21.7 至 1570mg O m day 和沉积物 31.9 至 3670mg O m day,与受人为影响的养分和微生物群落结构相关。氧化亚氮(NO)浓度范围为 0.22 至 4.41μg NO liter;NO 浓度与森林土地利用呈负相关,与溶解无机氮浓度呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,溪流微生物群落受到流域土地利用的影响,并且可能用于评估生态系统健康状况。溪流生态系统经常受到流域土地利用变化的影响,导致水文变化、污染物和养分负荷增加以及生境退化。大型无脊椎动物和鱼类受到溪流条件变化的强烈影响,通常用于生物指标来评估生态系统健康状况。同样,微生物对环境胁迫做出响应,群落组成的变化改变了关键的生态系统过程。微生物对栖息地退化的响应及其在全球生物地球化学循环中的作用为将微生物作为监测工具提供了机会。在这里,我们确定了对流域城市化和农业发展有响应的溪流微生物,并证明了微生物多样性和群落结构可用于评估溪流状况和生态系统功能。