Centre for Mental Health Education and Research, Delmont Private Hospital, Glen Iris, VIC, Australia.
Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
CNS Drugs. 2020 May;34(5):473-507. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00718-4.
Aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine differ from all other second-generation antipsychotics due to partial agonism at the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. In contrast to aripiprazole, brexpiprazole has lower intrinsic dopamine D2 activity and higher affinity for the serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, while cariprazine has the highest affinity for the dopamine D3 receptor, and the longest half-life. The main adverse effect of dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs) is akathisia of low-to-moderate severity, which occurs in a small proportion of patients, usually in the first few weeks of treatment. While definitive conclusions concerning differences between the DRPAs require head-to-head comparison studies, on the available evidence, akathisia is probably least likely to occur with brexpiprazole and most likely with cariprazine; the risk of akathisia with aripiprazole lies in between. Weight-gain risk is low with aripiprazole and cariprazine, but moderate with brexpiprazole. Risk of sedation is low with DRPAs, as is risk of insomnia and nausea. Partial dopamine agonism leads to a low risk for hyperprolactinaemia (and probably a low risk of sexual dysfunction). Prolactin concentrations fall in some patients (particularly those with elevated levels prior to initiating the drugs). Rates of discontinuation due to adverse effects in pivotal studies were low, and on the whole, DRPAs are well tolerated. Aripiprazole has been implicated in pathological gambling and other impulse control behaviours, likely due to partial dopamine agonist activity (there have been no reports with brexpiprazole and cariprazine). The risks for diabetes and tardive dyskinesia with DRPAs are unknown, but are likely to be low. On the basis of tolerability, DRPAs should be considered as first-line treatment options, particularly in patients with early schizophrenia.
阿立哌唑、布瑞哌唑和卡利拉嗪与所有其他第二代抗精神病药物不同,因为它们在多巴胺 D2 和 D3 受体上具有部分激动作用。与阿立哌唑不同,布瑞哌唑的内在多巴胺 D2 活性较低,对 5-羟色胺 5-HT1A 和 5-HT2A 受体的亲和力较高,而卡利拉嗪对多巴胺 D3 受体的亲和力最高,半衰期最长。多巴胺受体部分激动剂(DRPAs)的主要不良反应是低至中度的静坐不能,这种不良反应发生在一小部分患者中,通常在治疗的头几周。虽然关于 DRPAs 之间差异的明确结论需要头对头比较研究,但根据现有证据,静坐不能最不可能发生在布瑞哌唑,最可能发生在卡利拉嗪;阿立哌唑发生静坐不能的风险介于两者之间。阿立哌唑和卡利拉嗪的体重增加风险较低,而布瑞哌唑的风险则较高。DRPAs 的镇静风险低,失眠和恶心的风险也低。部分多巴胺激动作用导致高催乳素血症的风险低(可能性功能障碍的风险也低)。一些患者的催乳素浓度下降(特别是那些在开始用药前催乳素水平升高的患者)。主要研究中因不良反应而停药的发生率较低,总的来说,DRPAs 的耐受性良好。阿立哌唑与病理性赌博和其他冲动控制行为有关,可能是由于部分多巴胺激动作用(布瑞哌唑和卡利拉嗪没有相关报道)。DRPAs 导致糖尿病和迟发性运动障碍的风险尚不清楚,但可能较低。基于耐受性,DRPAs 应被视为一线治疗选择,特别是在早期精神分裂症患者中。