元流行病学的争议与辩论。论文2：关于偏倚的元流行病学研究本身可能存在偏倚。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 2: Meta-epidemiological studies of bias may themselves be biased.

作者信息

Herbert Robert D

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) Randwick NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:127-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.024

PMID:32247656

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 2: Meta-epidemiological studies of bias may themselves be biased.元流行病学的争议与辩论。论文2：关于偏倚的元流行病学研究本身可能存在偏倚。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:127-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 4: Confounding and other concerns in meta-epidemiological studies of bias.元流行病学的争议与辩论。论文4：偏倚的元流行病学研究中的混杂及其他问题。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:133-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 3: Causal inference from meta-epidemiology: a reasonable goal, or wishful thinking?元流行病学的争议与辩论。论文3：从元流行病学进行因果推断：是一个合理的目标，还是一厢情愿的想法？

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:131-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta-epidemiological study-the MetaBLIND study as a case.当解释一项荟萃流行病学研究（以 MetaBLIND 研究为例）结果时需要考虑的十个问题。

Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):260-274. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1392. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

No evidence found for an association between trial characteristics and treatment effects in randomized trials of testosterone therapy in men: a meta-epidemiological study.未发现随机对照试验中睾丸素治疗男性的试验特征与治疗效果之间存在关联的证据：一项meta 流行病学研究。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine.偏倚和小样本研究效应影响治疗效果估计：口腔医学的荟萃流行病学研究。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 21.

A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.一项meta流行病学研究，旨在检验新生儿试验中偏倚与治疗效果之间的关联。

Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):1052-9. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1985.

Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.关于：干预措施的荟萃分析除了随机对照试验外是否应纳入观察性研究？对基本原则的批判性审视。

Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 15;169(6):783; author reply 783-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp016. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.系统评价和随机对照试验评估针刺治疗抑郁症的偏倚风险和报告质量：概述和荟萃流行病学研究。

J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12372.

No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.近期个体参与者数据荟萃分析中不存在数据可得性偏倚的一致性证据：一项荟萃流行病学研究。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:107-114.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

The influence of bias in randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies.随机对照试验中的偏倚对康复干预效果评估的影响：从荟萃流行病学研究中得到的启示。

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;60(1):135-144. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08310-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Allocation concealment appraisal of clinical therapy trials using the extended Composite Quality Score (CQS-2)-An empirically based update.使用扩展综合质量评分（CQS-2）对临床治疗试验的分配隐藏评估——基于实证的更新

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 15;10:1176219. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1176219. eCollection 2023.

Estimating the effect of COVID-19 on trial design characteristics: a registered report.评估2019冠状病毒病对试验设计特征的影响：一份预注册报告

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jan 11;10(1):201543. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201543. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Extension of the Composite Quality Score (CQS) as an appraisal tool for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials-A systematic review of meta-epidemiological evidence.将复合质量评分（CQS）扩展为前瞻性、对照临床治疗试验的评估工具——荟萃流行病学证据的系统评价。

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279645. eCollection 2022.

Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies.试验水平特征与治疗效果估计相关：荟萃流行病学研究的系统评价。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01650-5.

Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study.评价医学研究中随机对照试验和队列研究证据体之间的一致性：一项meta 流行病学研究。

BMC Med. 2022 May 11;20(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02369-2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验