Suppr超能文献

2018 年国际髋关节和膝关节假体周围感染慢性感染共识会议次要标准:单中心验证。

The 2018 International Consensus Meeting Minor Criteria for Chronic Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Validation From a Single Center.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2200-2203. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a revised definition of the minor criteria scoring system for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was developed by the second International Consensus Meeting on musculoskeletal infection. The new system combines preoperative and intraoperative findings, reportedly achieving high sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to validate the modified scoring system at a high-volume center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a revision total hip or knee arthroplasty at our institution from May 2015 to August 2018. Serum C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage, leukocyte esterase test, alpha-defensin, microbiological and histologic results, and documented existence of sinus tract and intraoperative purulence were available for all patients. Cases with at least 1 major criterion were considered as infected. Using the new minor criteria, a score of ≥6 reflects PJI, while a score <3 can be considered as noninfected. Sensitivity, specificity, mean accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 345 cases were included. A cutoff score of ≥6 points had the following diagnostic performance: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90; ACC = 0.88; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.84; PPV = 0.70; NPV = 0.98. Diagnostic performance was better for the hip (AUC = 0.92; ACC = 0.90; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.86; PPV = 0.81; NPV = 0.98) than the knee (AUC = 0.89; ACC = 0.85; sensitivity = 0.95; specificity = 0.83; PPV = 0.59; NPV = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

The modified scoring system proposed by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting in diagnosing PJI showed high sensitivity and a good performance, especially as rule-out diagnostic criteria. The cutoff level seems to be different between the hip and knee. Further validation studies considering the acknowledged limitations are recommended.

摘要

背景

最近,第二届国际肌肉骨骼感染共识会议制定了修订后的假体周围关节感染(PJI)次要标准评分系统的定义。新系统结合了术前和术中的发现,据称具有较高的敏感性和特异性。我们旨在高容量中心验证改良评分系统。

方法

我们回顾性地审查了 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 8 月期间在我院接受翻修全髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者。所有患者均有血清 C 反应蛋白、滑膜白细胞计数和多形核细胞百分比、白细胞酯酶试验、α-防御素、微生物学和组织学结果以及窦道和术中脓液的存在记录。至少有 1 项主要标准的病例被认为是感染。使用新的次要标准,评分≥6 反映 PJI,而评分<3 可视为非感染。分析了敏感性、特异性、平均准确度(ACC)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

共纳入 345 例。截点评分≥6 分具有以下诊断性能:曲线下面积(AUC)=0.90;ACC=0.88;敏感性=0.96;特异性=0.84;PPV=0.70;NPV=0.98。髋关节(AUC=0.92;ACC=0.90;敏感性=0.96;特异性=0.86;PPV=0.81;NPV=0.98)的诊断性能优于膝关节(AUC=0.89;ACC=0.85;敏感性=0.95;特异性=0.83;PPV=0.59;NPV=0.98)。

结论

2018 年国际共识会议提出的改良评分系统在诊断 PJI 方面具有较高的敏感性和良好的性能,尤其是作为排除性诊断标准。髋关节和膝关节之间的截止水平似乎有所不同。建议进行进一步的验证研究,以考虑到公认的局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验