• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达州和纽约州患者因素及手术对主动脉夹层入院后再入院的影响。

Impact of patient factors and procedure on readmission after aortic dissection admission in the states of Florida and New York.

作者信息

Weiss Salome, Rojas Ricardo L, Habermann Elizabeth B, Moriarty James P, Borah Bijan J, DeMartino Randall R

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1277-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.046. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.046
PMID:32247702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Readmissions after aortic dissection (AD) admission are not well described. Using state-based administrative claims data, we sought to define readmission rates after AD and to identify factors associated with them.

METHODS

State Inpatient Databases for Florida (2007-2012) and New York (2008-2012) were queried for AD index admissions. Admissions were stratified by initial treatment strategy: type A open surgery repair (TAOR), type B open surgery repair (TBOR), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), or medical management (MM). All-cause readmission rates were calculated at 30 days, 90 days, and 2 years. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with readmission at each time point for all type A admissions (TAOR) or type B admissions (TBOR, TEVAR, MM).

RESULTS

We identified 4670 patients with an AD index admission. Treatment was with TAOR in 1031 (22%), TBOR in 761 (16%), TEVAR in 412 (9%), and MM in 2466 (53%). Patients were predominantly male (59.4%) and white (61.9%), with a median age of 66 years. Overall mortality during AD index admission was 14.8% (TAOR, 15.8%; TBOR, 17.1%; TEVAR, 9.0%; MM, 14.7%; P = .002 across all groups). All-cause readmission rates were similar across treatment groups at 30 days (9.6%-11%; P = .56), 90 days (15.2%-20%; P = .26), and 2 years (49.2%-54.4%; P = .15). Higher income quartile (vs lowest) was associated with lower odds of early readmission (at 30 days and 90 days) after type B admissions but not after type A admissions. At 2 years, self-pay (vs Medicare) was associated with lower odds of readmission in both type A and type B admissions, whereas higher comorbidity count and black race (vs white) were associated with higher odds of readmission. TEVAR (vs MM) was also associated with higher odds of readmission. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause for readmission at all time points. Emergency department readmission counts were highest after MM admissions, and ambulatory surgical admissions were highest after TBOR. Both TEVAR and MM initial costs were lower than TAOR and TBOR costs, but at 2 years, costs remained significantly lower only for MM.

CONCLUSIONS

In-state 30-day, 90-day, and 2-year readmission rates after AD were not associated with initial treatment type. Two-year readmissions are common. Strategies to target socioeconomic, race, and geographic factors may reduce variations in readmission patterns after AD admission.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层(AD)入院后的再入院情况尚未得到充分描述。利用基于州的行政索赔数据,我们试图确定AD后的再入院率,并识别与之相关的因素。

方法

查询佛罗里达州(2007 - 2012年)和纽约州(2008 - 2012年)的州住院数据库以获取AD索引入院病例。入院病例按初始治疗策略分层:A型开放手术修复(TAOR)、B型开放手术修复(TBOR)、胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)或药物治疗(MM)。计算30天、90天和2年的全因再入院率。采用逻辑回归分析确定所有A型入院(TAOR)或B型入院(TBOR、TEVAR、MM)在每个时间点与再入院相关的因素。

结果

我们确定了4670例有AD索引入院的患者。其中1031例(22%)接受TAOR治疗,761例(16%)接受TBOR治疗,412例(9%)接受TEVAR治疗,2466例(53%)接受MM治疗。患者以男性(59.4%)和白人(61.9%)为主,中位年龄为66岁。AD索引入院期间的总体死亡率为14.8%(TAOR为15.8%;TBOR为17.1%;TEVAR为9.0%;MM为14.7%;所有组间P = 0.002)。各治疗组在30天(9.6% - 11%;P = 0.56)、90天(15.2% - 20%;P = 0.26)和2年(49.2% - 54.4%;P = 0.15)的全因再入院率相似。较高收入四分位数(与最低四分位数相比)与B型入院后早期再入院(30天和90天)几率较低相关,但与A型入院后无关。在2年时,自费(与医疗保险相比)与A型和B型入院再入院几率较低相关,而较高的合并症计数和黑人种族(与白人相比)与再入院几率较高相关。TEVAR(与MM相比)也与再入院几率较高相关。心血管疾病是所有时间点再入院最常见的原因。MM入院后急诊科再入院次数最高,TBOR后门诊手术入院次数最高。TEVAR和MM的初始成本均低于TAOR和TBOR成本,但在2年时,仅MM的成本仍显著较低。

结论

AD后州内30天、90天和2年再入院率与初始治疗类型无关。2年再入院很常见。针对社会经济、种族和地理因素的策略可能会减少AD入院后再入院模式的差异。

相似文献

1
Impact of patient factors and procedure on readmission after aortic dissection admission in the states of Florida and New York.佛罗里达州和纽约州患者因素及手术对主动脉夹层入院后再入院的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1277-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.046. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Performance of current claims-based approaches to identify aortic dissection hospitalizations.当前基于索赔的方法识别主动脉夹层住院的性能。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.047. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Improving mortality trends for hospitalization of aortic dissection in the National Inpatient Sample.美国国家住院样本中主动脉夹层住院死亡率趋势的改善情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):606-615.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.427. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
Readmissions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后再入院。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):372-382.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.035. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Open and endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.全国住院患者样本中 B 型主动脉夹层的开放和血管内修复。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):860-6; discussion 866. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.008.
6
National trends in admissions, repair, and mortality for thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection in the National Inpatient Sample.国家住院患者样本中胸主动脉瘤和 B 型夹层的入院、修复和死亡率的全国趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jun;67(6):1649-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.050. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
Readmissions after acute type B aortic dissection.急性 B 型主动脉夹层的再入院情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):73-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.280. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
8
Thirty-day outcomes from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection project.血管外科学会血管质量倡议胸主动脉夹层修复项目 30 天结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):680-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.203.
9
Coronary artery bypass graft readmission rates and risk factors - A retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉旁路移植术再入院率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients.高危患者使用主动脉弓烟囱支架行胸主动脉腔内修复术的疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):9-20.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.063.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in hospital outcomes of medically-managed type B aortic dissection.药物治疗的B型主动脉夹层患者住院结局的性别差异。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 8;12:1597266. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1597266. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus medical therapy for treatment of type B aortic dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术与药物治疗在 B 型主动脉夹层治疗中的疗效比较。
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02555-4.
3
Readmission after thoracic endovascular aortic repair following blunt thoracic aortic injury.
胸主动脉钝性损伤行胸主动脉腔内修复术后再入院。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Apr;50(2):551-559. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02432-4. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
National trends in repair for type B aortic dissection.B 型主动脉夹层修复的全国趋势。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1058-1068. doi: 10.1002/clc.23672. Epub 2021 Jun 26.