Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Am J Med. 2020 Jul;133(7):789-794. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.033. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
Clinicians are challenged to stay informed of new and changing medical literature. To facilitate knowledge updates and synthesis of practice-changing information, a group of 6 internists reviewed the titles and abstracts in the 7 outpatient general internal medicine journals with the highest impact factors and relevance to outpatient internal medicine physicians: New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), JAMA Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal (BMJ), and Public Library of Science (PLoS) Medicine. The following collections of article synopses and databases were also reviewed: American College of Physicians Journal Club, NEJM Journal Watch, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, McMaster/DynaMed Evidence Alerts, and Cochrane Reviews. A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus based on clinical relevance to outpatient internal medicine, potential impact on practice, and strength of evidence. Article qualities and importance were debated until consensus was reached. Clusters of articles pertaining to the same topic were considered together. In total, 7 practice-changing articles were included.
临床医生面临着了解新的和不断变化的医学文献的挑战。为了促进知识更新和实践改变信息的综合,一组 6 名内科医生审查了与门诊内科医生最相关的具有最高影响因素的 7 种门诊普通内科医学期刊的标题和摘要:《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEJM)、《柳叶刀》、《内科学年鉴》、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)、《JAMA 内科杂志》、《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)和《公共科学图书馆·医学》(PLoS Medicine)。还审查了以下文章摘要集和数据库:美国医师学院杂志俱乐部、NEJM 期刊观察、BMJ 循证医学、麦克马斯特/DynaMed 证据警报和 Cochrane 评论。使用改良 Delphi 方法根据与门诊内科的临床相关性、对实践的潜在影响和证据强度达成共识。在达成共识之前,对文章质量和重要性进行了辩论。与同一主题相关的文章群被一起考虑。共有 7 篇实践改变的文章被纳入。