Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Am J Med. 2021 Jul;134(7):854-859. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
In a time of rapidly shifting evidence-based medicine, it is challenging to stay informed of research that modifies clinical practice. To enhance knowledge of practice-changing literature, a group of 7 internists reviewed titles and abstracts in 7 internal medicine journals with the highest impact factors and relevance to outpatient general internal medicine. Coronavirus disease-19 research was purposely excluded to highlight practice changes beyond the pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), JAMA Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal (BMJ), and Public Library of Science (PLoS) Medicine were reviewed. The following collections of article synopses and databases were also reviewed: American College of Physicians Journal Club, NEJM Journal Watch, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, McMaster/DynaMed Evidence Alerts, and Cochrane Reviews. A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus based on relevance to outpatient internal medicine, impact on practice, and strength of evidence. Clusters of articles pertaining to the same topic were considered together. In total, 7 practice-changing articles were included.
在瞬息万变的循证医学时代,及时了解改变临床实践的研究极具挑战性。为了增强对改变实践文献的了解,一组 7 名内科医生审查了具有最高影响因素且与门诊普通内科相关的 7 种内科期刊的标题和摘要。为了突出大流行之外的实践变化,专门排除了与冠状病毒病-19 相关的研究。审查了《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEJM)、《柳叶刀》、《内科学年鉴》、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)、《JAMA 内科》、《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)和《公共科学图书馆·医学》。还审查了以下文章摘要和数据库的集合:美国医师学院杂志俱乐部、NEJM 期刊观察、BMJ 循证医学、麦克马斯特/DynaMed 证据警报和 Cochrane 综述。使用改良 Delphi 方法基于与门诊内科的相关性、对实践的影响和证据强度达成共识。与同一主题相关的文章集群被一起考虑。共有 7 篇改变实践的文章被包括在内。