• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cardiovagal baroreflex gain relates to sensory loss after spinal cord injury.心脏迷走反射增益与脊髓损伤后的感觉丧失有关。
Auton Neurosci. 2020 Jul;226:102667. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102667. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Abnormal heart rate and blood pressure responses to baroreflex stimulation in multiple sclerosis patients.多发性硬化症患者对压力反射刺激的心率和血压异常反应。
Clin Auton Res. 2005 Jun;15(3):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s10286-005-0274-7.
3
Correlating autonomic physiology with symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后自主神经生理学与自主神经反射异常症状的相关性研究。
PM R. 2025 May;17(5):478-484. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13295. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
4
Longitudinal Assessment of Autonomic Function during the Acute Phase of Spinal Cord Injury: Use of Low-Frequency Blood Pressure Variability as a Quantitative Measure of Autonomic Function.脊髓损伤急性期自主神经功能的纵向评估:低频血压变异性作为自主神经功能的定量测量指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Feb;38(3):309-321. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7286. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Impaired Baroreflex Function during Orthostatic Challenge in Patients after Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者直立倾斜试验期间的压力感受反射功能受损。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Dec 15;34(24):3381-3387. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.4989. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
6
High-intensity, whole-body exercise improves blood pressure control in individuals with spinal cord injury: A prospective randomized controlled trial.高强度全身运动可改善脊髓损伤患者的血压控制:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247576. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical correlates of frequency analyses of cardiovascular control after spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后心血管控制频率分析的临床相关性
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):H668-78. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00869.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
8
Baroreflex autonomic control in human spinal cord injury: Physiology, measurement, and potential alterations.人类脊髓损伤中的压力反射自主控制:生理学、测量及潜在改变
Auton Neurosci. 2018 Jan;209:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Increased central arterial stiffness explains baroreflex dysfunction in spinal cord injury.中枢动脉僵硬度增加可解释脊髓损伤中的压力反射功能障碍。
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jun 15;31(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3280. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Sympathetic baroreflex gain in normotensive pregnant women.正常血压孕妇的交感神经压力反射增益
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Sep 1;119(5):468-74. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00131.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Spontaneous indices correlate with baroreflex gain only in adults with spinal cord injury.自发指数仅在脊髓损伤的成年人中与压力反射增益相关。
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s10286-025-01158-0.
2
Effects of Spinal Cord Injury Site on Cardiac Autonomic Regulation: Insight from Analysis of Cardiovascular Beat by Beat Variability during Sleep and Orthostatic Challenge.脊髓损伤部位对心脏自主调节的影响:基于睡眠和直立应激期间逐搏心血管变异性分析的见解
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Dec 9;7(4):112. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7040112.
3
Reductions in Cardiac Structure and Function 24 Months After Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study.脊髓损伤 24 个月后心脏结构和功能的变化:一项横断面研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug;102(8):1490-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.070. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Impaired Baroreflex Function during Orthostatic Challenge in Patients after Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者直立倾斜试验期间的压力感受反射功能受损。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Dec 15;34(24):3381-3387. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.4989. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Autonomic consequences of spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤的自主神经后果。
Compr Physiol. 2014 Oct;4(4):1419-53. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130045.
3
Increased central arterial stiffness explains baroreflex dysfunction in spinal cord injury.中枢动脉僵硬度增加可解释脊髓损伤中的压力反射功能障碍。
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jun 15;31(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3280. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准》2011年修订版参考文献。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):547-54. doi: 10.1179/107902611X13186000420242.
5
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011年修订)
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695.
6
Clinical correlates of frequency analyses of cardiovascular control after spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后心血管控制频率分析的临床相关性
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):H668-78. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00869.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
7
Mechanisms of blood pressure and heart rate variability: an insight from low-level paraplegia.血压和心率变异性的机制:来自低位截瘫的见解
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Apr;292(4):R1502-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00273.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
8
Autonomic nervous system influence on arterial baroreflex control of heart rate during exercise in humans.自主神经系统对人体运动期间心率的动脉压力反射控制的影响。
J Physiol. 2005 Jul 15;566(Pt 2):599-611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.084541. Epub 2005 May 5.
9
Spontaneous indices are inconsistent with arterial baroreflex gain.自发指数与动脉压力反射增益不一致。
Hypertension. 2003 Oct;42(4):481-7. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000091370.83602.E6. Epub 2003 Sep 15.
10
Baroreflex buffering is reduced with age in healthy men.在健康男性中,压力反射缓冲功能会随着年龄增长而降低。
Circulation. 2003 Apr 8;107(13):1770-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000057811.86187.88. Epub 2003 Mar 17.

心脏迷走反射增益与脊髓损伤后的感觉丧失有关。

Cardiovagal baroreflex gain relates to sensory loss after spinal cord injury.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

Auton Neurosci. 2020 Jul;226:102667. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102667. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102667
PMID:32247945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7245547/
Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to autonomic nervous system damage, resulting in loss of sympathetic control to the vasculature and the heart proportional to injury level. Given maintained cardiac parasympathetic control, we hypothesized that SCI demonstrates a compensatory, higher baroreflex gain compared to able-bodied that relates to injury level (neurological and/or sensory). We compared baroreflex gain (average and across 10-20, 20-30, and 30-40 mmHg input stimuli) derived from neck chamber technique in SCI (N = 29; neurological level C1-T10, sensory zone of partial preservation C4-S4/5; ≤2 yrs since injury) and able-bodied (N = 14). Average gain tended to be higher in able-bodied compared to SCI (p = 0.06), primarily due to higher gains at 10-20 and 20-30 mmHg (p = 0.03, p = 0.06). In SCI, although gain was not related to neurological level, average gain and gain at 10-20 mmHg was related to sensory zone of partial preservation and resting RR-interval (all p < 0.02). Multiple regression showed that both sensory level and RR-interval were strongly predictive of average baroreflex gain (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and gain at 10-20 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.01); gain decreased with higher sensory zone of partial preservation and lower resting RR-interval. Moreover, gain was significantly lower in those with high sensory level compared to both able-bodied (average gain and gain at 10-20 and 20-30 mmHg p < 0.01) and those with low level injury (all p < 0.05). In SCI, sensory zone of partial preservation is more predictive of gain than neurological level. This might reflect that those with high level sensory injuries may have the lowest likelihood of intact cardiac sympathetic innervation and therefore lesser cardiac vagal responsiveness due to vagal-sympathetic interactions.

摘要

脊髓损伤 (SCI) 导致自主神经系统损伤,导致血管和心脏的交感神经控制丧失与损伤水平成正比。鉴于心脏副交感神经控制保持不变,我们假设 SCI 表现出代偿性更高的压力反射增益,与健全人相比,这与损伤水平(神经和/或感觉)相关。我们比较了 SCI(N=29;神经水平 C1-T10,感觉区部分保留 C4-S4/5;受伤后≤2 年)和健全人(N=14)中颈室技术得出的压力反射增益(平均增益和 10-20、20-30 和 30-40mmHg 输入刺激的增益)。与 SCI 相比,健全人平均增益趋于更高(p=0.06),主要是由于 10-20 和 20-30mmHg 时的增益更高(p=0.03,p=0.06)。在 SCI 中,尽管增益与神经水平无关,但平均增益和 10-20mmHg 时的增益与部分感觉区的保留和静息 RR 间隔有关(均 p<0.02)。多元回归显示,感觉水平和 RR 间隔均强烈预测平均压力反射增益(r=0.41,p<0.01)和 10-20mmHg 时的增益(r=0.51,p<0.01);感觉区部分保留越高,RR 间隔越低,增益越低。此外,与健全人(平均增益和 10-20 和 20-30mmHg 时的增益 p<0.01)和低水平损伤者(均 p<0.05)相比,高感觉水平者的增益明显更低。在 SCI 中,部分感觉区的保留比神经水平更能预测增益。这可能反映出那些具有高水平感觉损伤的人可能具有最低的完整心脏交感神经支配的可能性,因此由于迷走神经-交感神经相互作用,心脏迷走神经反应性更低。