Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Auton Neurosci. 2020 Jul;226:102667. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2020.102667. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to autonomic nervous system damage, resulting in loss of sympathetic control to the vasculature and the heart proportional to injury level. Given maintained cardiac parasympathetic control, we hypothesized that SCI demonstrates a compensatory, higher baroreflex gain compared to able-bodied that relates to injury level (neurological and/or sensory). We compared baroreflex gain (average and across 10-20, 20-30, and 30-40 mmHg input stimuli) derived from neck chamber technique in SCI (N = 29; neurological level C1-T10, sensory zone of partial preservation C4-S4/5; ≤2 yrs since injury) and able-bodied (N = 14). Average gain tended to be higher in able-bodied compared to SCI (p = 0.06), primarily due to higher gains at 10-20 and 20-30 mmHg (p = 0.03, p = 0.06). In SCI, although gain was not related to neurological level, average gain and gain at 10-20 mmHg was related to sensory zone of partial preservation and resting RR-interval (all p < 0.02). Multiple regression showed that both sensory level and RR-interval were strongly predictive of average baroreflex gain (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and gain at 10-20 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.01); gain decreased with higher sensory zone of partial preservation and lower resting RR-interval. Moreover, gain was significantly lower in those with high sensory level compared to both able-bodied (average gain and gain at 10-20 and 20-30 mmHg p < 0.01) and those with low level injury (all p < 0.05). In SCI, sensory zone of partial preservation is more predictive of gain than neurological level. This might reflect that those with high level sensory injuries may have the lowest likelihood of intact cardiac sympathetic innervation and therefore lesser cardiac vagal responsiveness due to vagal-sympathetic interactions.
脊髓损伤 (SCI) 导致自主神经系统损伤,导致血管和心脏的交感神经控制丧失与损伤水平成正比。鉴于心脏副交感神经控制保持不变,我们假设 SCI 表现出代偿性更高的压力反射增益,与健全人相比,这与损伤水平(神经和/或感觉)相关。我们比较了 SCI(N=29;神经水平 C1-T10,感觉区部分保留 C4-S4/5;受伤后≤2 年)和健全人(N=14)中颈室技术得出的压力反射增益(平均增益和 10-20、20-30 和 30-40mmHg 输入刺激的增益)。与 SCI 相比,健全人平均增益趋于更高(p=0.06),主要是由于 10-20 和 20-30mmHg 时的增益更高(p=0.03,p=0.06)。在 SCI 中,尽管增益与神经水平无关,但平均增益和 10-20mmHg 时的增益与部分感觉区的保留和静息 RR 间隔有关(均 p<0.02)。多元回归显示,感觉水平和 RR 间隔均强烈预测平均压力反射增益(r=0.41,p<0.01)和 10-20mmHg 时的增益(r=0.51,p<0.01);感觉区部分保留越高,RR 间隔越低,增益越低。此外,与健全人(平均增益和 10-20 和 20-30mmHg 时的增益 p<0.01)和低水平损伤者(均 p<0.05)相比,高感觉水平者的增益明显更低。在 SCI 中,部分感觉区的保留比神经水平更能预测增益。这可能反映出那些具有高水平感觉损伤的人可能具有最低的完整心脏交感神经支配的可能性,因此由于迷走神经-交感神经相互作用,心脏迷走神经反应性更低。