Hamner Jason W, Draghici Adina, Martinez-Magallanes Daniela, Taylor J Andrew
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital Cambridge, 1575 Cambridge St., Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding Rehabilitation, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s10286-025-01158-0.
Spontaneous indices have been widely used to assess baroreflex gain despite their numerous limitations and concerns regarding their validity, reliability, and reproducibility. In this retrospective study, we investigated whether spontaneous baroreflex indices reflect cardiovagal baroreflex gain assessed by the neck-chamber technique in those with spinal cord injury (SCI) and in uninjured individuals. SCI represents a model of preserved cardiovagal baroreflex control coupled with impaired sympathetic effects on the vasculature.
We derived three spontaneous indices of baroreflex sensitivity (sequence method, low-frequency (LF), and high-frequency (HF) transfer function) and compared them with baroreflex gain obtained via the neck-chamber technique in adults with SCI (n = 29; neurological level C1-T10, ≤ 2 years since injury) and uninjured adults (n = 14).
In both groups, spontaneous indices were highly correlated with each other (all p < 0.01). In uninjured participants, neck suction baroreflex gain did not relate to any spontaneous index. In individuals with SCI, neck-chamber gain correlated significantly with spontaneous indices (all r > 0.43, p < 0.05); these relationships were significantly stronger in individuals with neurologically complete injuries (sequence: r = 0.67, p < 0.01; LF: r = 0.79, p < 0.001; HF: r = 0.76, p < 0.001). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a strong proportional bias, with spontaneous indices consistently and progressively overestimating neck-chamber gain (all r > 0.91, p < 0.001).
These results suggest that sympathetic activity is largely responsible for the lack of correspondence between spontaneous and neck-chamber baroreflex gains. However, even in individuals with a neurologically complete SCI, where sympathetic influences are minimal, spontaneous indices may not consistently reflect baroreflex gain derived from other methods.
尽管自发性指标存在诸多局限性,且在有效性、可靠性和可重复性方面存在诸多问题,但仍被广泛用于评估压力反射增益。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了自发性压力反射指标是否能反映通过颈室技术评估的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者和未受伤个体的心脏迷走神经压力反射增益。SCI是一种保留心脏迷走神经压力反射控制但交感神经对血管系统影响受损的模型。
我们得出了三个压力反射敏感性的自发性指标(序列法、低频(LF)和高频(HF)传递函数),并将它们与通过颈室技术在成年SCI患者(n = 29;神经损伤平面C1 - T10,受伤后≤2年)和未受伤成年人(n = 14)中获得的压力反射增益进行比较。
在两组中,自发性指标之间高度相关(所有p < 0.01)。在未受伤参与者中,颈部吸引压力反射增益与任何自发性指标均无关联。在SCI个体中,颈室增益与自发性指标显著相关(所有r > 0.43,p < 0.05);这些关系在神经损伤完全的个体中明显更强(序列法:r = 0.67,p < 0.01;LF:r = 0.79,p < 0.001;HF:r = 0.76,p < 0.001)。然而,Bland - Altman分析显示存在强烈的比例偏差,自发性指标持续且逐渐高估颈室增益(所有r > 0.91,p < 0.001)。
这些结果表明,交感神经活动在很大程度上导致了自发性和颈室压力反射增益之间缺乏对应关系。然而,即使在神经损伤完全的SCI个体中,交感神经影响最小,自发性指标也可能无法始终如一地反映其他方法得出的压力反射增益。