Suppr超能文献

持续气道正压通气(CPAP)预防阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者心血管事件的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Sebastian, Concepcion, Chile; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.

Centro de Enfermedades Respiratorias y grupo de estudio trastornos respiratorios del sueño (GETRS), Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Aug;52:101312. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101312. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly occurs in patients with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the preferred therapy for these patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of CPAP for CV prevention in OSA patients. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers explored different databases and evaluated the risk of bias. Outcomes were defined as the relative risk (RR) of major CV events (MACEs), CV mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, atrial fibrillation (Afrib) and heart failure. We performed both subgroup and meta-regression analyses by sleepiness status, adherence, and OSA severity. The certainty of evidence was rated according to GRADE. A total of 8 RCTs and 5817 participants were included. The results showed an RR of 0.87 (CI, 0.70-1.10) for MACEs, an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.62-1.43) for CV mortality, an RR of 1.04 (CI, 0.79-1.37) for myocardial infarction, an RR of 1.05 (CI, 0.51-2.15) for unstable angina, an RR of 0.92 (CI, 0.68-1.23) for heart failure, an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.71-1.26) for stroke, and an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.54-1.64) for Afrib. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression revealed no effect on our proposed outcomes. Although there is no evidence that CPAP therapy improves CV outcomes, concerns regarding risk of bias, CPAP adherence, and the population included in each RCT may have reduced the strength of the findings to support the benefit in all patients, and future research exploring these relevant outcomes is needed. REVIEW REGISTER: PROSPERO CRD42019145803.

摘要

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)常发生于心血管风险增加的患者中,持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是此类患者的首选治疗方法。本研究旨在评估 CPAP 治疗 OSA 患者预防心血管疾病的疗效。我们进行了系统的随机对照试验(RCT)综述。两位独立的审查员探索了不同的数据库并评估了偏倚风险。结局定义为主要心血管事件(MACEs)、心血管死亡率、心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、卒中和心房颤动(Afrib)和心力衰竭的相对风险(RR)。我们通过嗜睡状态、依从性和 OSA 严重程度进行了亚组和荟萃回归分析。证据的确定性根据 GRADE 进行评级。共纳入 8 项 RCT 和 5817 名参与者。结果显示,MACEs 的 RR 为 0.87(CI,0.70-1.10),心血管死亡率的 RR 为 0.94(CI,0.62-1.43),心肌梗死的 RR 为 1.04(CI,0.79-1.37),不稳定型心绞痛的 RR 为 1.05(CI,0.51-2.15),心力衰竭的 RR 为 0.92(CI,0.68-1.23),卒中和 Afrib 的 RR 分别为 0.94(CI,0.71-1.26)。亚组分析和荟萃回归未显示对我们提出的结局有影响。尽管没有证据表明 CPAP 治疗能改善心血管结局,但对偏倚风险、CPAP 依从性和每项 RCT 纳入的人群的担忧可能会降低发现的强度,无法支持对所有患者的获益,需要进一步的研究来探索这些相关结局。综述注册:PROSPERO CRD42019145803。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验