IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;67(12):3339-3351. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2984003. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
This randomized controlled feasibility study investigates the ability for clinical application of the Brain-Computer Interface-based Soft Robotic Glove (BCI-SRG) incorporating activities of daily living (ADL)-oriented tasks for stroke rehabilitation.
Eleven recruited chronic stroke patients were randomized into BCI-SRG or Soft Robotic Glove (SRG) group. Each group underwent 120-minute intervention per session comprising 30-minute standard arm therapy and 90-minute experimental therapy (BCI-SRG or SRG). To perform ADL tasks, BCI-SRG group used motor imagery-BCI and SRG, while SRG group used SRG without motor imagery-BCI. Both groups received 18 sessions of intervention over 6 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores were measured at baseline (week 0), post- intervention (week 6), and follow-ups (week 12 and 24). In total, 10/11 patients completed the study with 5 in each group and 1 dropped out.
Though there were no significant intergroup differences for FMA and ARAT during 6-week intervention, the improvement of FMA and ARAT seemed to sustain beyond 6-week intervention for BCI-SRG group, as compared with SRG control. Incidentally, all BCI-SRG subjects reported a sense of vivid movement of the stroke-impaired upper limb and 3/5 had this phenomenon persisting beyond intervention while none of SRG did.
BCI-SRG suggested probable trends of sustained functional improvements with peculiar kinesthetic experience outlasting active intervention in chronic stroke despite the dire need for large-scale investigations to verify statistical significance.
Addition of BCI to soft robotic training for ADL-oriented stroke rehabilitation holds promise for sustained improvements as well as elicited perception of motor movements.
本随机对照可行性研究旨在调查基于脑-机接口的软体机器人手套(BCI-SRG)结合日常生活活动(ADL)导向任务应用于中风康复的临床应用能力。
招募的 11 名慢性中风患者被随机分为 BCI-SRG 或软体机器人手套(SRG)组。每组接受每次 120 分钟的干预,包括 30 分钟的标准手臂治疗和 90 分钟的实验治疗(BCI-SRG 或 SRG)。为了执行 ADL 任务,BCI-SRG 组使用运动想象-BCI,而 SRG 组使用没有运动想象-BCI 的 SRG。两组均在 6 周内接受 18 次干预。在基线(第 0 周)、干预后(第 6 周)和随访(第 12 周和第 24 周)时测量 Fugl-Meyer 运动评估(FMA)和动作研究上肢测试(ARAT)评分。共有 10/11 名患者完成了研究,每组 5 名,1 名退出。
尽管在 6 周的干预期间,两组的 FMA 和 ARAT 没有显著差异,但与 SRG 对照组相比,BCI-SRG 组的 FMA 和 ARAT 的改善似乎在 6 周的干预后持续存在。有趣的是,所有 BCI-SRG 受试者都报告说中风受损上肢有生动的运动感觉,其中 3/5 在干预后仍有这种现象,而 SRG 则没有。
尽管需要大规模的研究来验证统计学意义,但 BCI-SRG 表明,尽管慢性中风患者需要大规模的研究来验证统计学意义,但在基于软机器人训练的 ADL 导向中风康复中添加 BCI 可能会持续改善,并引起运动感觉的感知。
在 ADL 导向的中风康复中,BCI 与软机器人训练的结合具有持续改善以及引发运动感觉感知的潜力。