Suppr超能文献

心房颤动和中等射血分数患者在抗凝模式、血栓形成及死亡风险方面存在差异,且独立于CHADS-VAS评分。

Patients with atrial fibrillation and mid-range ejection fraction differ in anticoagulation pattern, thrombotic and mortality risk independently of CHADS-VAS score.

作者信息

Jurin Ivana, Lucijanic Marko, Jurin Hrvoje, Starcevic Boris, Varvodic Josip, Catic Jasmina, Jurisic Andjela, Vitlov Petra, Sokol Tomic Sanda, Lucijanic Jelena, Hadzibegovic Irzal

机构信息

Cardiology Department, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Suska 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

Hematology Department, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Suska 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2020 Sep;35(9):1243-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01603-2. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (mrEF) of 40-49% have neither preserved (pEF > 50%) nor reduced (rEF < 40%) EF and are increasingly being recognized as a distinct group with specific clinical risks. We aimed to retrospectively investigate clinical characteristics and associated thrombotic, bleeding and mortality risks of mrEF in comparison to pEF and rEF in a cohort of 1000 non-valvular AF patients presenting in our institution during the period 2013-2018. Patients with mrEF presented with older age (P < 0.001) and a higher frequency of arterial hypertension (P = 0.001) in comparison to both pEF and rEF patients. In comparison to pEF, mrEF patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (P = 0.004), lower HDL-cholesterol (P < 0.001) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001), significantly higher CHADS-VAS score (P < 0.001), significantly higher HAS-BLED score (P = 0.002) and had a higher likelihood of receiving anticoagulant therapy, mostly warfarin (P = 0.001). In addition, mrEF patients had a significantly higher risk of thrombotic events (HR = 2.22; P = 0.015), death (HR = 1.71; P = 0.005) and composite endpoint of thrombosis, bleeding or death (HR = 1.65; P = 0.003) in comparison to pEF patients, but did not significantly differ in comparison to rEF patients. There was no significant difference regarding major bleeding risk. Associations with clinical outcomes remained statistically significant in multivariate models independently of CHADS-VAS. Our findings support defining AF patients with mrEF as a subgroup with distinct clinical characteristics and increased risk for thrombotic events and death, irrespective of predetermined CHADS-VAS risk. These patients seem to require special clinical considerations and more intensive control of cardiovascular risk factors.

摘要

左心室射血分数(mrEF)为40%-49%的心房颤动(AF)患者,其射血分数既未保留(pEF>50%)也未降低(rEF<40%),并且越来越被视为具有特定临床风险的独特群体。我们旨在回顾性研究1000例2013年至2018年期间在我院就诊的非瓣膜性AF患者中,mrEF与pEF和rEF相比的临床特征以及相关的血栓形成、出血和死亡风险。与pEF和rEF患者相比,mrEF患者年龄更大(P<0.001),动脉高血压发生率更高(P = 0.001)。与pEF相比,mrEF患者更易患糖尿病(P = 0.004),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇更低(P<0.001),估算肾小球滤过率更低(P<0.001),CHADS-VAS评分显著更高(P<0.001),HAS-BLED评分显著更高(P = 0.002),接受抗凝治疗的可能性更高,主要是华法林(P = 0.001)。此外,与pEF患者相比,mrEF患者发生血栓事件的风险显著更高(HR = 2.22;P = 0.015)、死亡风险更高(HR = 1.71;P = 0.005)以及血栓形成、出血或死亡的复合终点风险更高(HR = 1.65;P = 0.003),但与rEF患者相比无显著差异。在大出血风险方面无显著差异。在多变量模型中,与临床结局的关联独立于CHADS-VAS仍具有统计学意义。我们的研究结果支持将mrEF的AF患者定义为具有独特临床特征且血栓事件和死亡风险增加的亚组,无论预先确定的CHADS-VAS风险如何。这些患者似乎需要特殊的临床考虑以及更严格地控制心血管危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验