• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心房颤动和中等射血分数患者在抗凝模式、血栓形成及死亡风险方面存在差异,且独立于CHADS-VAS评分。

Patients with atrial fibrillation and mid-range ejection fraction differ in anticoagulation pattern, thrombotic and mortality risk independently of CHADS-VAS score.

作者信息

Jurin Ivana, Lucijanic Marko, Jurin Hrvoje, Starcevic Boris, Varvodic Josip, Catic Jasmina, Jurisic Andjela, Vitlov Petra, Sokol Tomic Sanda, Lucijanic Jelena, Hadzibegovic Irzal

机构信息

Cardiology Department, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Suska 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

Hematology Department, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Suska 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2020 Sep;35(9):1243-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01603-2. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-020-01603-2
PMID:32248252
Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (mrEF) of 40-49% have neither preserved (pEF > 50%) nor reduced (rEF < 40%) EF and are increasingly being recognized as a distinct group with specific clinical risks. We aimed to retrospectively investigate clinical characteristics and associated thrombotic, bleeding and mortality risks of mrEF in comparison to pEF and rEF in a cohort of 1000 non-valvular AF patients presenting in our institution during the period 2013-2018. Patients with mrEF presented with older age (P < 0.001) and a higher frequency of arterial hypertension (P = 0.001) in comparison to both pEF and rEF patients. In comparison to pEF, mrEF patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (P = 0.004), lower HDL-cholesterol (P < 0.001) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001), significantly higher CHADS-VAS score (P < 0.001), significantly higher HAS-BLED score (P = 0.002) and had a higher likelihood of receiving anticoagulant therapy, mostly warfarin (P = 0.001). In addition, mrEF patients had a significantly higher risk of thrombotic events (HR = 2.22; P = 0.015), death (HR = 1.71; P = 0.005) and composite endpoint of thrombosis, bleeding or death (HR = 1.65; P = 0.003) in comparison to pEF patients, but did not significantly differ in comparison to rEF patients. There was no significant difference regarding major bleeding risk. Associations with clinical outcomes remained statistically significant in multivariate models independently of CHADS-VAS. Our findings support defining AF patients with mrEF as a subgroup with distinct clinical characteristics and increased risk for thrombotic events and death, irrespective of predetermined CHADS-VAS risk. These patients seem to require special clinical considerations and more intensive control of cardiovascular risk factors.

摘要

左心室射血分数(mrEF)为40%-49%的心房颤动(AF)患者,其射血分数既未保留(pEF>50%)也未降低(rEF<40%),并且越来越被视为具有特定临床风险的独特群体。我们旨在回顾性研究1000例2013年至2018年期间在我院就诊的非瓣膜性AF患者中,mrEF与pEF和rEF相比的临床特征以及相关的血栓形成、出血和死亡风险。与pEF和rEF患者相比,mrEF患者年龄更大(P<0.001),动脉高血压发生率更高(P = 0.001)。与pEF相比,mrEF患者更易患糖尿病(P = 0.004),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇更低(P<0.001),估算肾小球滤过率更低(P<0.001),CHADS-VAS评分显著更高(P<0.001),HAS-BLED评分显著更高(P = 0.002),接受抗凝治疗的可能性更高,主要是华法林(P = 0.001)。此外,与pEF患者相比,mrEF患者发生血栓事件的风险显著更高(HR = 2.22;P = 0.015)、死亡风险更高(HR = 1.71;P = 0.005)以及血栓形成、出血或死亡的复合终点风险更高(HR = 1.65;P = 0.003),但与rEF患者相比无显著差异。在大出血风险方面无显著差异。在多变量模型中,与临床结局的关联独立于CHADS-VAS仍具有统计学意义。我们的研究结果支持将mrEF的AF患者定义为具有独特临床特征且血栓事件和死亡风险增加的亚组,无论预先确定的CHADS-VAS风险如何。这些患者似乎需要特殊的临床考虑以及更严格地控制心血管危险因素。

相似文献

1
Patients with atrial fibrillation and mid-range ejection fraction differ in anticoagulation pattern, thrombotic and mortality risk independently of CHADS-VAS score.心房颤动和中等射血分数患者在抗凝模式、血栓形成及死亡风险方面存在差异,且独立于CHADS-VAS评分。
Heart Vessels. 2020 Sep;35(9):1243-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01603-2. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.在接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,HAS-BLED 评分对大出血的预测准确性优于 CHADS2 或 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;62(23):2199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1623. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Stroke and bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: evaluating 'valvular heart disease' in a nationwide cohort study.心房颤动和心脏瓣膜病患者的卒中与出血风险评分:在全国范围内队列研究中评估“心脏瓣膜病”。
Europace. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy151.
4
[A comparison of CAS risk model and CHADS-VASc risk model in guiding anticoagulation treatment in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation].[中国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中CAS风险模型与CHADS-VASc风险模型在指导抗凝治疗中的比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 24;50(9):888-894. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210826-00740.
5
Effect of Adherence to Oral Anticoagulants on Risk of Stroke and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.口服抗凝剂依从性对心房颤动患者中风风险和大出血的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23;5(2):e003074. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003074.
6
Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.改善房颤患者的风险分层:用于预测抗凝和未抗凝患者的死亡率、卒中和出血的 GARFIELD-AF 综合工具。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e017157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017157.
7
Reasons for and consequences of oral anticoagulant underuse in atrial fibrillation with heart failure.心房颤动伴心力衰竭患者口服抗凝剂使用率低的原因及后果。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1093-1100. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312720. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
8
Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.利伐沙班与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动伴非性别相关 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 1 分患者中的有效性和安全性。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):64-69. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy025.
9
Prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc Score = 0 in a community-based cohort study.基于社区队列研究的 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 0 的心房颤动患者的预后。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Jul;23(7):708-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02257.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
10
The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation.风险评分(CHADS2与CHA2DS2-VASc)对心房颤动消融术后长期预后的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):681-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Failure with Mid-Range or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction in the Era of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors: Do We Now Provide Better Care for the "Middle Child of HF"? Real-World Experience from a Single Clinical Centre.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂时代射血分数中度降低或轻度降低的心力衰竭:我们现在是否为“心力衰竭的中间孩子”提供了更好的治疗?来自单一临床中心的真实世界经验。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 31;11(6):171. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060171.
2
First-degree atrioventricular block is significantly associated with incident atrial fibrillation in the population predominantly including participants aged ≥ 60 years.一度房室传导阻滞与人群中心房颤动的发生显著相关,人群主要包括年龄≥60 岁的参与者。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Sep;36(9):1401-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01805-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.