Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
PM R. 2020 Oct;12(10):957-966. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12374. Epub 2020 May 6.
Lower-limb amputation (LLA) due to non-traumatic vascular etiology is linked to extremely low physical activity and high disability.
To test the feasibility of a biobehavioral intervention designed to promote physical activity.
A randomized, single-blind feasibility trial with a crossover design.
Veterans Administration Medical Center.
Military veterans (age: 65.7 [7.8] years; mean [standard deviation]) with nontraumatic lower-limb amputation (LLA), randomized to two groups: GROUP1 (n = 16) and GROUP2 (n = 15). Both groups had similar baseline amputation characteristics (level of amputation and time since amputation).
Twelve weekly, 30-minute telehealth sessions of physical activity behavior-change intervention, with GROUP1 participating in weeks 1-12 and GROUP2 in weeks 13-24. GROUP1 noncontact phase in weeks 13-24 and GROUP2 attention control telehealth phase in weeks 1-12.
Feasibility (participant retention, dose goal attainment, intervention acceptability [Intrinsic Motivation Inventory [IMI] Interest and Enjoyment scale], safety) and signal of efficacy (free-living physical activity [accelerometer-based average daily step count], Late Life Function and Disability Index - Disability Scale [LLFDI-DS]).
Participant retention rate was high (90%), with three participants lost to follow-up during the intervention period. Dose goal attainment was low, with only 10% of participants achieving an a priori walking dose goal. Intervention was rated as acceptable, with mean IMI Interest and Enjoyment score (5.8) statistically higher than the null value of 5.0 (P = .002). There were no between-group differences in adverse event rates (falls: P = .19, lower extremity wounds: P = .60). There was no signal of efficacy for change in average daily step count (d = -0.15) or LLFDI-DS (d = -0.22 and 0.17 for frequency and limitations scales, respectively).
Telehealth delivered biobehavioral intervention resulted in acceptable participant retention, low dose goal attainment, high participant acceptability, and low safety risk, while having no signal of efficacy (physical activity, disability) for people with nontraumatic LLA.
非创伤性血管病因导致的下肢截肢(LLA)与极低的身体活动和高度残疾有关。
测试旨在促进身体活动的生物行为干预措施的可行性。
一项随机、单盲可行性试验,采用交叉设计。
退伍军人管理局医疗中心。
非创伤性下肢截肢(LLA)的退伍军人(年龄:65.7 [7.8] 岁;平均值[标准差]),随机分为两组:GROUP1(n=16)和 GROUP2(n=15)。两组的截肢基线特征相似(截肢水平和截肢后时间)。
十二周、每周 30 分钟的身体活动行为改变干预的远程医疗会议,GROUP1 在前 12 周参加,GROUP2 在后 13-24 周参加。GROUP1 在第 13-24 周非接触期,GROUP2 在第 1-12 周注意控制远程医疗期。
可行性(参与者保留率、剂量目标达成率、干预接受度[内在动机量表[IMI]兴趣和享受量表]、安全性)和疗效信号(自由生活身体活动[计步器平均每日步数]、晚年功能和残疾指数-残疾量表[LLFDI-DS])。
参与者保留率很高(90%),有 3 名参与者在干预期间失访。剂量目标达成率低,只有 10%的参与者达到了预先设定的步行剂量目标。干预措施被评为可接受,平均 IMI 兴趣和享受得分(5.8)明显高于 5.0 的零值(P=0.002)。两组间不良事件发生率无差异(跌倒:P=0.19,下肢伤口:P=0.60)。平均每日步数(d=-0.15)或 LLFDI-DS(频率和限制量表分别为 d=-0.22 和 0.17)无疗效信号。
远程医疗提供的生物行为干预措施导致参与者保留率高、剂量目标达成率低、参与者接受度高、安全性风险低,而对于非创伤性 LLA 患者,没有身体活动、残疾方面的疗效信号。