University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):557-577. doi: 10.1177/0886260520913212. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Multiple types of childhood adversities are risk factors for dating violence among college-age youth and in turn, dating violence is associated with alcohol use. This work quantitatively examines associations of childhood adversity and dating violence with alcohol use among college students using a cumulative stress approach. Multi-campus surveys were collected from March to December 2016 in four universities across the United States and Canada ( = 3,710). Latent class analysis identified patterns of childhood adversity and dating violence. Regression analyses investigated the associations of latent class patterns with past year number of drinks, alcohol use frequency, and problematic drinking. Latent class analysis produced seven classes: "low violence exposure" (18.5%), "predominantly peer violence" (28.9%), "peer violence and psychological child abuse" (10.8%), "peer and parental domestic violence" (9.9%), "peer and psychological dating violence" (17%), "peer and dating violence" (6.6%), and "childhood adversity and psychological dating violence" (8.3%). Compared to the "low violence exposure" group, "peer and psychological dating violence" ( = .114, < .05), "peer and dating violence" ( = .143, < .05), and "childhood adversity and psychological dating violence" ( = .183, < .001) groups were significantly associated with problematic drinking. Results highlight how childhood adversity and dating violence contribute to problematic alcohol use, suggesting interventions that address both childhood adversity and dating violence may be most effective at reducing alcohol misuse among college students.
多种类型的儿童期逆境是大学年龄青年约会暴力的危险因素,而约会暴力与饮酒有关。这项工作采用累积应激方法定量研究了儿童期逆境和约会暴力与大学生饮酒之间的关联。2016 年 3 月至 12 月,在美国和加拿大的四所大学进行了多校区调查(n=3710)。潜在类别分析确定了儿童期逆境和约会暴力的模式。回归分析调查了潜在类别模式与过去一年饮酒量、饮酒频率和问题性饮酒之间的关联。潜在类别分析产生了七个类别:“低暴力暴露”(18.5%)、“主要是同伴暴力”(28.9%)、“同伴暴力和心理儿童虐待”(10.8%)、“同伴和父母家庭暴力”(9.9%)、“同伴和心理约会暴力”(17%)、“同伴和约会暴力”(6.6%)和“儿童期逆境和心理约会暴力”(8.3%)。与“低暴力暴露”组相比,“同伴和心理约会暴力”(β=.114,p<0.05)、“同伴和约会暴力”(β=.143,p<0.05)和“儿童期逆境和心理约会暴力”(β=.183,p<0.001)组与问题性饮酒显著相关。结果突出了儿童期逆境和约会暴力如何导致问题性饮酒,这表明解决儿童期逆境和约会暴力的干预措施可能最有效地减少大学生的酒精滥用。