Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment of Ministry of Education, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, College of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment of Ministry of Education, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, College of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110321. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110321. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Globally, some vegetation has grown significantly over the past decades, but the climate benefits remain unclear, especially in the temperate regions. Understanding the biophysical effects and identifying the potential of vegetation will help to mitigate climate change. Here, we propose a vegetation-adjusted temperature index to understand how terrestrial vegetation growth in China affects the air temperature for 2001-2013, based on satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index, near-surface air temperature (T) and the land surface temperature. Grassland growth and cropland growth are found to cool the T by -0.08 ± 0.32 °C (mean ± one standard deviation) and -0.06 ± 0.28 °C, respectively. Forest growth results in net climate warming by 0.05 ± 0.29 °C. Biophysical effects, elevation and background climate are used to explain the climate impacts of vegetation. Results show that the biophysical effects dominate the climate impact. More specifically, evapotranspiration (ET) controls the daytime climate impact, and at night, an indirect effect of albedo (the release of daytime heat storage) dominates it. Lower precipitation, temperature and elevation reinforce the warming potential. Moreover, the effects of albedo and ET on climate are nonlinear. During the day, although lower albedo absorbs more incoming radiation, it releases more extra heat per unit ET that can compensate for the increased incoming radiation. At night, the warming effect reflects the release of daytime heat storage. Overall, tropical vegetation growth (-0.04 ± 0.10 °C) and warm temperate vegetation growth (-0.08 ± 0.15 °C) achieve the climatic benefits. Overall, the method proposed contributes to quantitatively evaluate the role of afforestation plan on regional climate cooling, and provides some policy/practical implications for future afforestation projects. Future afforestation projects should carefully consider the biophysical process and background climate to mitigate climate change.
全球范围内,过去几十年间一些植被显著增长,但气候效益仍不明确,尤其是在温带地区。了解植被的生物物理效应并确定其潜力有助于缓解气候变化。在这里,我们提出了一种基于卫星衍生的归一化植被指数、近地表气温(T)和陆面温度的植被调整温度指数,以了解中国陆地植被生长如何影响 2001-2013 年的气温。草地和耕地的生长分别使 T 降温了-0.08±0.32°C(均值±一个标准差)和-0.06±0.28°C。森林生长导致净气候变暖 0.05±0.29°C。生物物理效应、海拔和背景气候被用来解释植被的气候影响。结果表明,生物物理效应主导了气候影响。更具体地说,蒸散(ET)控制了白天的气候影响,而在夜间,反照率(释放白天的热储存)的间接效应占主导地位。较低的降水、温度和海拔增强了变暖的潜力。此外,反照率和 ET 对气候的影响是非线性的。在白天,尽管较低的反照率吸收了更多的入射辐射,但它每单位 ET 释放的额外热量更多,可以补偿增加的入射辐射。在夜间,变暖效应反映了白天热储存的释放。总的来说,热带植被生长(-0.04±0.10°C)和暖温带植被生长(-0.08±0.15°C)实现了气候效益。总的来说,所提出的方法有助于定量评估造林计划对区域气候冷却的作用,并为未来的造林项目提供一些政策/实际意义。未来的造林项目应仔细考虑生物物理过程和背景气候,以缓解气候变化。