Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110459. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110459. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
High Rate Algae Ponds (HRAPs) are a promising technology for the treatment of municipal wastewater in locations with sufficient space and solar radiation. Algae-based processes do not require aeration, and thus have the potential to be less energy-intensive than activated sludge processes. We used a combination of LCA and LCCA analysis to evaluate the sustainability of HRAP systems, using data from the construction and operation of two demonstration-scale systems in Almería and Cádiz, Spain. As a reference for comparison, we used data from an activated sludge-based Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) treatment system in operation in Leppersdorf, Germany, which has comparable removal rates for a similar inflow. We focused solely on the actual wastewater treatment aspect of these technologies, excluding sludge treatment from this analysis. Based on our analysis, the current HRAP technology is more energy-efficient than activated sludge-based SBRs and requires only 22% of its electricity consumption. In addition, HRAP is more advantageous both economically (0.18 €/m versus 0.26 €/m) and environmentally, with both lower global warming and eutrophication potentials (146.27 vs. 458.27 × 10 kg CO equiv./m; 126.14 vs. 158.01 × 10 kg PO equiv./m). However, the Net Environmental Benefit of SBR was slightly more favorable than of HRAP because of the higher removal rate for nutrients of SBR.
高效藻类塘(HRAPs)是一种在有足够空间和太阳辐射的地方处理城市废水的有前途的技术。基于藻类的工艺不需要曝气,因此有可能比活性污泥工艺的能源密集度更低。我们使用生命周期评估(LCA)和生命周期成本分析(LCCA)的组合来评估 HRAP 系统的可持续性,使用西班牙阿尔梅里亚和加的斯的两个示范规模系统的建设和运营数据。作为比较的参考,我们使用了德国 Leppersdorf 运行的基于活性污泥的序批式反应器(SBR)处理系统的数据,该系统具有类似进水的相似去除率。我们仅关注这些技术的实际废水处理方面,不包括污泥处理。根据我们的分析,目前的 HRAP 技术比基于活性污泥的 SBR 更节能,仅消耗其电力的 22%。此外,HRAP 在经济上(0.18 欧元/立方米与 0.26 欧元/立方米)和环境方面都更有利,其全球变暖潜势和富营养化潜势均较低(146.27 与 458.27×10kg CO 当量/立方米;126.14 与 158.01×10kg PO 当量/立方米)。然而,由于 SBR 对营养物的去除率更高,SBR 的净环境效益略优于 HRAP。