• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住宅建筑物生命周期可持续性评估的三重底线指标的发展。

Development of triple bottom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential bulidings.

机构信息

School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Australia.

School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476
PMID:32250902
Abstract

The growth of the building sector represents the progress of civilizations. There are environmental, social and economic implications, impeding the sustainability performance of buildings. A holistic life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework is inevitable to address the integrated sustainability performance of residential buildings. This paper aims to develop triple bottom line indicators to assess the sustainability performance of buildings, including sustainability objectives, impact categories and key performance indicators (KPIs) to implement in the life cycle sustainability assessment framework. The indicators have been developed through the consensus survey involving area experts from four key stakeholders' categories including, government and Engineers Australia, academia, practitioners, and structural engineers. A list of KPIs was compiled through a literature review, followed by an online census survey to collect feedback from the participants in terms of relevance and importance of initally selected KPIs. Secondly, a modified list of triple bottom line (TBL) KPIs and their weights was developed based on respondents' feedback. Finally, the threshold values were assigned to the selected KPIs and the LCSA framework was tested using a hypothetical case study. The LCSA framework using these scientifically valid KPIs would assist stakeholders to assess the sustainability performance of residential buildings and to identify the hotspots for proposing well-informed industry strategies in Western Australia.

摘要

建筑行业的发展代表着文明的进步。但它也会对环境、社会和经济产生影响,阻碍建筑的可持续性能。因此,有必要采用整体的生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)框架来评估住宅建筑的综合可持续性能。本文旨在开发三重底线指标,以评估建筑物的可持续性能,包括可持续性目标、影响类别和关键绩效指标(KPI),以在生命周期可持续性评估框架中实施。这些指标是通过涉及包括政府和澳大利亚工程师协会在内的四个主要利益相关者类别的区域专家的共识调查制定的,其他类别还包括学术界、从业者和结构工程师。通过文献综述编制了 KPI 清单,然后通过在线普查调查收集参与者对最初选定 KPI 的相关性和重要性的反馈。其次,根据受访者的反馈,制定了经过修改的三重底线(TBL)KPI 清单及其权重。最后,为选定的 KPI 分配了阈值,并使用假设案例研究对 LCSA 框架进行了测试。使用这些经过科学验证的 KPI 的 LCSA 框架将有助于利益相关者评估西澳大利亚住宅建筑的可持续性能,并确定提出明智行业战略的热点。

相似文献

1
Development of triple bottom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential bulidings.住宅建筑物生命周期可持续性评估的三重底线指标的发展。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Developing biodiversity indicators on a stakeholders' opinions basis: the gypsum industry Key Performance Indicators framework.基于利益相关者意见制定生物多样性指标:石膏行业关键绩效指标框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jul;23(14):13661-71. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5269-x. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
3
Assessment method for new sustainability indicators providing pandemic resilience for residential buildings.为住宅建筑提供大流行恢复力的新可持续性指标评估方法。
MethodsX. 2021 Nov 9;8:101577. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101577. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessing the sustainability of advanced materials using multicriteria decision analysis and the triple bottom line.使用多准则决策分析和三重底线评估先进材料的可持续性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Nov;15(6):1021-1028. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4205. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Developing key performance indicators for a tertiary children's hospital network.为三级儿童医院网络制定关键绩效指标。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Sep;42(5):491-500. doi: 10.1071/AH17263.
6
Implementing life cycle sustainability assessment for improved space mission design.实施生命周期可持续性评估以改进航天任务设计。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 Jul;19(4):1002-1022. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4722. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care.院前急救关键绩效指标的制定。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr;33(4):286-92. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204793. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Developing guideline-based key performance indicators for recurrent miscarriage care: lessons from a multi-stage consensus process with a diverse stakeholder group.制定基于指南的复发性流产护理关键绩效指标:来自与不同利益相关者群体进行的多阶段共识过程的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 May 14;8(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00355-9.
9
Identifying the criteria for community-centred Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of estate regeneration schemes.确定以社区为中心的房地产再生计划生命周期可持续性评估标准。
Heliyon. 2024 May 13;10(10):e31115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31115. eCollection 2024 May 30.
10
Status of sustainable manufacturing practices: literature review and trends of triple bottom-line-based sustainability assessment methodologies.可持续制造实践的现状:基于三重底线的可持续性评估方法的文献综述与趋势
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43068-43095. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22172-z. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamic evolution and obstacle identification of pseudo and reality human settlements in the central plains urban agglomeration of China.中国中原城市群中虚拟与现实人类住区的动态演变及障碍识别
Sci Rep. 2025 May 3;15(1):15476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00286-x.
2
Identifying the criteria for community-centred Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of estate regeneration schemes.确定以社区为中心的房地产再生计划生命周期可持续性评估标准。
Heliyon. 2024 May 13;10(10):e31115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31115. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3
Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development.
新冠疫情后可持续发展的三大支柱:一项系统综述及可持续发展的未来研究议程
J Clean Prod. 2021 May 15;297:126660. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660. Epub 2021 Mar 9.