Suppr超能文献

基于索赔的衰弱指数与 Medicare 年度费用的关系:一项队列研究。

Relationship of a Claims-Based Frailty Index to Annualized Medicare Costs: A Cohort Study.

机构信息

College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri (K.J.J.).

Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (H.W.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 21;172(8):533-540. doi: 10.7326/M19-3261. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicare uses the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) model to predict patients' annualized Medicare costs in value-based payment programs. The CMS-HCC model does not include measures of frailty, and prior research shows that it systematically underpredicts costs for frail Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a claims-based frailty index can improve Medicare cost prediction.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey linked to Medicare claims, 2006 to 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

16 535 community-dwelling, fee-for-service beneficiaries representing 26 705 patient-years.

MEASUREMENTS

Patient frailty status was classified using a validated claims-based frailty index. The association between the frailty index and annualized Medicare costs was examined, and regression methods were used to compare observed Medicare costs versus predictions based on the standard CMS-HCC model with and without the frailty index.

RESULTS

Mean costs were $5724 for the 8910 patients classified as robust (46.4% of patient-years), $12 462 for the 8405 prefrail patients (41.6%), $26 239 for the 2215 mildly frail patients (9.6%), and $44 586 for the 593 patients classified as moderately to severely frail (2.5%). The frailty index addition to the CMS-HCC model predicted on average an additional $2712, $7915, and $16 449 in costs for prefrail, mildly frail, and moderately to severely frail patients, respectively, beyond the CMS-HCC model alone. On average, the model with the frailty index addition resulted in more accurate predictions of costs for patients at all 4 levels of frailty. However, observed costs remained more widely distributed than predictions from the enhanced model at all levels of frailty.

LIMITATION

The claims-based index is a proxy for frailty and is likely less accurate than an in-person examination.

CONCLUSION

The CMS-HCC model with the frailty index addition is an improvement over current Medicare cost prediction.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

摘要

背景

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,CMS)使用分层条件类别(Hierarchical Condition Category,HCC)模型来预测基于价值的支付计划中患者的年度医疗保险费用。该 CMS-HCC 模型不包括脆弱性指标,并且先前的研究表明,它系统地低估了脆弱性医疗保险受益人的成本。

目的

确定基于索赔的脆弱性指数是否可以改善医疗保险费用预测。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置

2006 年至 2013 年,医疗保险当前受益人调查与医疗保险索赔相链接。

参与者

16535 名居住在社区、按服务收费的受益人,代表 26705 患者年。

测量

使用经过验证的基于索赔的脆弱性指数对患者脆弱性状况进行分类。检查脆弱性指数与年度医疗保险费用之间的关联,并使用回归方法比较观察到的医疗保险费用与基于标准 CMS-HCC 模型(包含和不包含脆弱性指数)的预测值。

结果

8910 名被归类为健壮的患者(46.4%的患者年)的平均费用为 5724 美元,8405 名处于虚弱前期的患者(41.6%)的平均费用为 12462 美元,2215 名轻度脆弱的患者(9.6%)的平均费用为 26239 美元,593 名被归类为中度至重度脆弱的患者(2.5%)的平均费用为 44586 美元。在 CMS-HCC 模型中添加脆弱性指数后,分别预测虚弱前期、轻度脆弱和中度至重度脆弱患者的平均额外费用为 2712 美元、7915 美元和 16449 美元,而不仅仅是 CMS-HCC 模型本身。平均而言,在所有 4 个脆弱性水平上,添加脆弱性指数的模型对患者成本的预测更加准确。然而,在所有脆弱性水平上,观察到的成本分布范围仍然比增强模型的预测范围更广。

局限性

基于索赔的指数是脆弱性的代理指标,可能不如亲自检查准确。

结论

在 CMS-HCC 模型中添加脆弱性指数是对当前医疗保险费用预测的改进。

主要资金来源

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验