Suppr超能文献

关节动度下的震波关节造影评估膝关节声音的可靠性。

Reliability of Vibroarthrography to Assess Knee Joint Sounds in Motion.

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology; Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, 35390 Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 2;20(7):1998. doi: 10.3390/s20071998.

Abstract

Knee acoustic emissions provide information about joint health and loading in motion. As the reproducibility of knee acoustic emissions by vibroarthrography is yet unknown, we evaluated the intrasession and interday reliability of knee joint sounds. In 19 volunteers (25.6 ± 2.0 years, 11 female), knee joint sounds were recorded by two acoustic sensors (16,000 Hz; medial tibial plateau, patella). All participants performed four sets standing up/sitting down (five repetitions each). For measuring intrasession reliability, we used a washout phase of 30 min between the first three sets, and for interday reliability we used a washout phase of one week between sets 3 and 4. The mean amplitude (dB) and median power frequency (Hz, MPF) were analyzed for each set. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs (2,1)), standard errors of measurement (SEMs), and coefficients of variability (CVs) were calculated. The intrasession ICCs ranged from 0.85 to 0.95 (tibia) and from 0.73 to 0.87 (patella). The corresponding SEMs for the amplitude were ≤1.44 dB (tibia) and ≤2.38 dB (patella); for the MPF, SEMs were ≤13.78 Hz (tibia) and ≤14.47 Hz (patella). The intrasession CVs were ≤0.06 (tibia) and ≤0.07 (patella) ( < 0.05). The interday ICCs ranged from 0.24 to 0.33 (tibia) and from 0 to 0.82 (patella) for both the MPF and amplitude. The interday SEMs were ≤4.39 dB (tibia) and ≤6.85 dB (patella) for the amplitude and ≤35.39 Hz (tibia) and ≤15.64 Hz (patella) for the MPF. The CVs were ≤0.14 (tibia) and ≤0.08 (patella). Knee joint sounds were highly repeatable within a single session but yielded inconsistent results for the interday reliability.

摘要

膝关节声发射提供了有关关节健康和运动中负荷的信息。由于关节声发射的重复性尚未可知,因此我们评估了膝关节声音的日内和日内可靠性。在 19 名志愿者(25.6 ± 2.0 岁,11 名女性)中,使用两个声学传感器(16,000 Hz;胫骨内侧平台,髌骨)记录膝关节声音。所有参与者均进行了四组站立/坐下(每组 5 次)。为了测量日内可靠性,我们在前三组之间使用了 30 分钟的冲洗阶段,而为了测量日间可靠性,我们在第三组和第四组之间使用了一周的冲洗阶段。分析了每组的平均幅度(dB)和中值功率频率(Hz,MPF)。计算了组内相关系数(ICC(2,1)),测量误差(SEM)和变异系数(CV)。日内 ICC 范围为 0.85 至 0.95(胫骨)和 0.73 至 0.87(髌骨)。幅度的相应 SEM 为≤1.44 dB(胫骨)和≤2.38 dB(髌骨);对于 MPF,SEM 为≤13.78 Hz(胫骨)和≤14.47 Hz(髌骨)。日内 CV 为≤0.06(胫骨)和≤0.07(髌骨)( < 0.05)。日内的 ICC 范围为 0.24 至 0.33(胫骨)和 0 至 0.82(髌骨),对于幅度和 MPF。日内 SEM 为≤4.39 dB(胫骨)和≤6.85 dB(髌骨),对于幅度和≤35.39 Hz(胫骨)和≤15.64 Hz(髌骨),用于 MPF。CV 为≤0.14(胫骨)和≤0.08(髌骨)。膝关节声音在单次会话内具有高度重复性,但在日内可靠性方面得出的结果不一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验