Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Jun;23(6):772-787. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1729420. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been hailed as a revolutionary intervention for HIV prevention. PrEP's controversial status in the UK has generated significant media coverage. It is important to understand what role the media plays in framing PrEP policy issues. We undertook a qualitative analysis of UK newsprint articles between 2012 and 2016 to examine how PrEP was framed as a public health intervention up until a controversial policy decision not to provide PrEP in England. We identified how scientific evidence was deployed to shape two narratives: focused on imagined PrEP users and their capacity to use PrEP effectively; and , which described the need for PrEP. Our analysis demonstrates the particular ways in which scientific evidence contributed to the certainty of PrEP as an effective intervention within UK newsprint. Scientific evidence also played a key role in framing PrEP as an intervention specifically for cis-gendered gay and bisexual men, playing into wider debates about who is a deserving patient and the appropriate use of public resources. Practitioners in the UK and elsewhere should be aware of these constructions of the PrEP user to ensure equitable access to PrEP beyond gay and bisexual men.
暴露前预防(PrEP)被誉为预防艾滋病毒的革命性干预措施。PrEP 在英国的争议地位引起了媒体的广泛关注。了解媒体在构建 PrEP 政策问题方面所扮演的角色非常重要。我们对 2012 年至 2016 年期间的英国新闻报纸文章进行了定性分析,以研究 PrEP 作为公共卫生干预措施的情况,直到做出不向英格兰提供 PrEP 的有争议的政策决定为止。我们确定了如何利用科学证据来构建两种叙述:一种是关注想象中的 PrEP 用户及其有效使用 PrEP 的能力;另一种是描述对 PrEP 的需求。我们的分析表明,科学证据在英国新闻报纸中对 PrEP 作为有效干预措施的确定性具有特殊作用。科学证据在将 PrEP 作为专门针对顺性别同性恋和双性恋男性的干预措施方面也发挥了关键作用,这进一步加剧了关于谁是值得的患者以及如何合理使用公共资源的更广泛的辩论。英国和其他地方的从业者应该意识到这些 PrEP 用户的构建,以确保在同性恋和双性恋男性之外,能够公平地获得 PrEP。