依维莫司对比阿培利司治疗激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性晚期乳腺癌:针对不同节点的 PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 通路具有不同的临床意义。
Everolimus versus alpelisib in advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: targeting different nodes of the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway with different clinical implications.
机构信息
IFOM, the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
出版信息
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 6;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01271-0.
BACKGROUND
The PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 axis is implicated in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+ HER2- mBC) resistance to anti-estrogen treatments. Based on results of the BOLERO-2 trial, the mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus in combination with the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane has become a standard treatment for patients with HR+ HER2- mBC resistant to prior non-steroidal AI therapy. In the recent SOLAR-1 trial, the inhibitor of the PI3K alpha subunit (p110α) alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to fulvestrant alone in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ HER2- mBC that progressed after/on previous AI treatment. Therefore, two different molecules targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 axis, namely everolimus and alpelisib, are available for patients progressing on/after previous AI treatment, but it is unclear how to optimize their use in the clinical practice. Here, we reviewed the available clinical evidence deriving from the BOLERO-2 and SOLAR-1 trials to compare efficacy and safety profiles of everolimus and alpelisib in advanced HR+ HER2- BC treatment. Adding either compound to standard endocrine therapy provided similar absolute and relative PFS advantage. In the SOLAR-1 trial, a 76% incidence of grade (G) 3 or 4 (G3/G4) adverse events was reported, while G3/G4 toxicities occurred in 42% of patients in the BOLERO-2 trial. While alpelisib was only effective in patients with PIK3CA-mutated neoplasms, retrospective analyses indicate that everolimus improves exemestane efficacy independently of PIK3CA mutational status.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available efficacy and safety data, the "new" alpelisib may be burdened by higher incidence of severe adverse events, higher costs, and anticancer efficacy that is limited to PIK3CA-mutated tumors when compared to the "old" everolimus. Therefore, the everolimus-exemestane combination remains an effective and reasonably well-tolerated therapeutic option for HR+ HER2- mBC patients progressing after/on previous AI treatment, independently of PIK3CA mutational status.
背景
PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 轴参与激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌(HR+ HER2- mBC)对抗雌激素治疗的耐药。基于 BOLERO-2 试验的结果,mTORC1 抑制剂依维莫司联合甾体芳香酶抑制剂(AI)依西美坦已成为先前非甾体 AI 治疗耐药的 HR+ HER2- mBC 患者的标准治疗。在最近的 SOLAR-1 试验中,PI3Kα亚单位(p110α)抑制剂阿培利司与氟维司群联合使用,与氟维司群单药治疗相比,可延长 PIK3CA 突变的 HR+ HER2- mBC 患者的无进展生存期(PFS),这些患者在先前的 AI 治疗后/期间进展。因此,对于先前 AI 治疗后进展的患者,有两种针对 PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 轴的不同分子,即依维莫司和阿培利司,可供选择,但在临床实践中如何优化它们的使用尚不清楚。在这里,我们回顾了 BOLERO-2 和 SOLAR-1 试验得出的现有临床证据,以比较依维莫司和阿培利司在 HR+ HER2- BC 治疗中的疗效和安全性。将这两种化合物添加到标准内分泌治疗中,均可提供相似的绝对和相对 PFS 优势。在 SOLAR-1 试验中,报告了 76%的 G3 或 4 级(G3/G4)不良事件发生率,而 BOLERO-2 试验中 42%的患者发生了 G3/G4 毒性。虽然阿培利司仅对 PIK3CA 突变肿瘤有效,但回顾性分析表明,依维莫司可改善 exemestane 的疗效,与 PIK3CA 突变状态无关。
结论
基于现有疗效和安全性数据,与“旧”依维莫司相比,“新”阿培利司可能因严重不良事件发生率更高、成本更高以及抗癌疗效仅限于 PIK3CA 突变肿瘤而受到影响。因此,对于先前 AI 治疗后/期间进展的 HR+ HER2- mBC 患者,依维莫司-依西美坦联合治疗仍然是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,与 PIK3CA 突变状态无关。