Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1557-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive bedside method used to quantify extravascular lung water (EVLW). To evaluate the methodology and diagnostic accuracy of LUS in studies assessing EVLW in intensive care unit patients, PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing LUS with imaging modalities. In 14 relevant studies a wide variety of equipment used and training of examiners were noted. Four scoring systems were reported: (i) a binary score (the presence of three or more B-lines); (ii) a categorical score; (iii) a numerical score; (iv) a quantitative LUS score using software. The diagnostic accuracy of LUS varied: sensitivity ranged from 50%-98%, specificity from 76%-100% and r² from 0.20-0.91. Methodology and diagnostic accuracy varies substantially in published reports. Further research is needed to correlate methodological factors with diagnostic accuracy. Hospitals should standardize LUS methodology. Consensus is needed to harmonize LUS methodology for lung water assessment.
肺部超声(LUS)是一种用于量化血管外肺水(EVLW)的非侵入性床边方法。为了评估 LUS 在评估 ICU 患者 EVLW 的研究中的方法学和诊断准确性,我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 上搜索了将 LUS 与成像方式进行比较的研究。在 14 项相关研究中,注意到了各种不同的设备使用和检查者的培训。报告了四种评分系统:(i)二分类评分(存在三个或更多 B 线);(ii)分类评分;(iii)数值评分;(iv)使用软件的定量 LUS 评分。LUS 的诊断准确性各不相同:敏感性范围为 50%-98%,特异性为 76%-100%,r²为 0.20-0.91。已发表的报告中方法学和诊断准确性存在很大差异。需要进一步的研究来将方法学因素与诊断准确性相关联。医院应规范 LUS 方法。需要达成共识以协调用于评估肺水的 LUS 方法。