• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲农场层面兽医抗菌药物基准制度评估:对英国反刍动物部门的影响。

Evaluation of veterinary antimicrobial benchmarking systems at farm-level in Europe: implications for the UK ruminant sector.

机构信息

Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Hillsborough, Hillsborough, UK

Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Hillsborough, Hillsborough, UK.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 2020 Nov 14;187(10):402. doi: 10.1136/vr.105727. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1136/vr.105727
PMID:32253354
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A number of European countries currently conduct mandatory farm-level benchmarking for antimicrobial usage (AMU). This review describes the systems used, with emphasis on metric type and practical implications.

METHODS

This report describes examples of four types of metrics used to measure AMU: count-based, mass-based, daily dose-based and course-based, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS

The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Switzerland use daily dose-based metrics to benchmark AMU at farm-level, but each country diverges from the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption methodology in its own way, including how the population 'at risk' is calculated. Germany operates a count-based system. Threshold AMU values have been specified at farm-level in the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark, and action is required from producers to reduce AMU above these values. The Netherlands and Belgium also benchmark veterinarians.

CONCLUSIONS

For mixed species farms common in the UK and Ireland, splitting AMU by species is recommended. It is also recommended that high priority critically important antimicrobials are benchmarked separately to other antimicrobials. No one metric is optimum; however, for ruminant livestock a daily dose-based metric allows for country-specific adaptations which may allow a higher degree of precision at farm-level benchmarking in the UK and Ireland.

摘要

背景

目前,一些欧洲国家对农场层面的抗菌药物使用(AMU)进行强制性基准测试。本综述描述了所使用的系统,重点介绍了度量类型和实际影响。

方法

本报告介绍了用于衡量 AMU 的四种类型的指标示例:基于计数、基于质量、基于日剂量和基于疗程的指标,每种指标都有其自身的优缺点。

结果

荷兰、比利时、丹麦和瑞士使用基于日剂量的指标在农场层面进行 AMU 基准测试,但每个国家都以自己的方式偏离了欧洲兽医抗菌药物使用监测方法,包括如何计算“风险”人群。德国采用基于计数的系统。荷兰、比利时和丹麦已在农场层面规定了 AMU 的阈值,超过这些值,生产商就需要采取行动降低 AMU。荷兰和比利时还对兽医进行基准测试。

结论

对于在英国和爱尔兰常见的混合物种农场,建议按物种划分 AMU。还建议将高优先级的关键重要抗菌药物与其他抗菌药物分开进行基准测试。没有一种指标是最优的;然而,对于反刍动物,基于日剂量的指标允许进行特定于国家的调整,这可能允许在英国和爱尔兰的农场层面基准测试中达到更高的精度。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of veterinary antimicrobial benchmarking systems at farm-level in Europe: implications for the UK ruminant sector.欧洲农场层面兽医抗菌药物基准制度评估:对英国反刍动物部门的影响。
Vet Rec. 2020 Nov 14;187(10):402. doi: 10.1136/vr.105727. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Biosecurity and antimicrobial use in broiler farms across nine European countries: toward identifying farm-specific options for reducing antimicrobial usage.肉鸡养殖场的生物安全和抗菌药物使用情况:在九个欧洲国家:寻找减少抗菌药物使用的具体农场选项。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Dec 27;151:e13. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822001960.
3
Quantitative analysis of antimicrobial use on British dairy farms.英国奶牛场抗菌药物使用情况的定量分析。
Vet Rec. 2017 Dec 23;181(25):683. doi: 10.1136/vr.104614. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
Quantification of antimicrobial usage in adult cows and preweaned calves on 40 large Wisconsin dairy farms using dose-based and mass-based metrics.使用基于剂量和基于质量的指标对威斯康星州 40 家大型奶牛场的成年奶牛和断奶前小牛的抗菌药物使用情况进行定量评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Apr;104(4):4727-4745. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19315. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Antimicrobial usage in farm animal practices in the UK: A mixed-methods approach.英国农场动物实践中的抗菌药物使用:混合方法研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Apr;213:105870. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105870. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
Evaluation of metrics for benchmarking antimicrobial use in the UK dairy industry.英国乳制品行业抗菌药物使用基准指标的评估
Vet Rec. 2018 Mar 31;182(13):379. doi: 10.1136/vr.104701. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Antimicrobial usage and resistance in scottish dairy herds: a survey of farmers' knowledge, behaviours and attitudes.苏格兰奶牛场的抗菌药物使用与耐药性:对农场主知识、行为和态度的调查。
BMC Vet Res. 2023 May 19;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03625-0.
8
Key farm characteristics associated with the level of antimicrobial use in rosé veal production - A Danish database study.与玫瑰小牛肉生产中抗菌药物使用水平相关的关键养殖场特征——一项丹麦数据库研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2025 Feb;235:106406. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106406. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
9
Does the Use of Different Indicators to Benchmark Antimicrobial Use Affect Farm Ranking?使用不同指标对标抗菌药物使用情况会影响养殖场排名吗?
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 13;7:558793. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.558793. eCollection 2020.
10
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antimicrobial usage at farm and flock level on 181 broiler farms in nine European countries.在九个欧洲国家的 181 个肉鸡养殖场中对农场和禽群水平的抗菌药物使用进行定量和定性分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Mar 1;74(3):798-806. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky498.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying veterinary surgeons' barriers to, and potential solutions for, improving antimicrobial stewardship among sheep farmers in Northern Ireland.识别兽医在改善北爱尔兰养羊农户抗菌药物管理方面面临的障碍及潜在解决方案。
Vet Rec Open. 2024 Apr 12;11(1):e278. doi: 10.1002/vro2.78. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Assessment of the Implementation of Pakistan's National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in the Agriculture and Food Sectors.巴基斯坦农业和食品部门抗微生物药物耐药性国家行动计划实施情况评估
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;13(3):206. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030206.
3
Improving analgesia provision for sheep: An analysis of farm medicine records and attitudes towards pain relief on sheep farms in Northern Ireland.
改善绵羊的镇痛措施:对北爱尔兰绵羊农场的兽医记录及对疼痛缓解态度的分析
Vet Rec Open. 2023 Oct 23;10(2):e75. doi: 10.1002/vro2.75. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Improving farm-level antimicrobial stewardship benchmarks by reporting antimicrobial use within the context of both the magnitude of disease pressure and the outcome of therapy.通过在疾病压力程度和治疗结果的背景下报告抗菌药物使用情况,提高农场层面的抗菌药物管理基准。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9:1022557. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1022557. eCollection 2022.
5
Reducing Antimicrobial Use and Dependence in Livestock Production Systems: A Social and Economic Sciences Perspective on an Interdisciplinary Approach.减少畜牧生产系统中的抗菌药物使用与依赖:跨学科方法的社会和经济科学视角
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 18;8:584593. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.584593. eCollection 2021.
6
Does the Use of Different Indicators to Benchmark Antimicrobial Use Affect Farm Ranking?使用不同指标对标抗菌药物使用情况会影响养殖场排名吗?
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 13;7:558793. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.558793. eCollection 2020.
7
Small and Large Animal Veterinarian Perceptions of Antimicrobial Use Metrics for Hospital-Based Stewardship in the United States.美国小型和大型动物兽医对基于医院管理的抗菌药物使用指标的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 8;7:582. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00582. eCollection 2020.