Pastore R E
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton 13901.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Dec;84(6):2262-70. doi: 10.1121/1.397019.
Kewley-Port, Watson, and Foyle [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1133-1145 (1988)] describe a study that uses several different procedures to measure thresholds for stimuli whose components differ in temporal onset. Unfortunately, misunderstandings and misconceptions (shared with other recent publications) resulted in conclusions that are both unnecessary and unwarranted. The Kewley-Port et al. article is discussed in terms of often replicated published findings on temporal order thresholds, and current misconceptions of perceptual concepts and models.
凯斯利 - 波特、沃森和福伊尔[《美国声学学会杂志》83, 1133 - 1145 (1988)]描述了一项研究,该研究使用了几种不同的程序来测量其成分在时间起始上有所不同的刺激的阈值。不幸的是,(与其他近期出版物共有的)误解和错误观念导致了既不必要又不合理的结论。本文将根据关于时间顺序阈值的经常重复发表的研究结果,以及当前对感知概念和模型的误解来讨论凯斯利 - 波特等人的文章。