Watson C S, Kewley-Port D
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Dec;84(6):2266-70. doi: 10.1121/1.397020.
Pastore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 2262-2266 (1988)] has written a lengthy response to Kewley-Port, Watson, and Foyle [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1133-1145 (1988)]. In this reply to Pastore's letter, several of his arguments are addressed, and new data are reported which support the conclusion of the original article. That conclusion is, basically, that the temporal acuity of the auditory system does not appear to be the origin of categorical perception of speech or nonspeech sounds differing in temporal onsets.
帕斯托雷[《美国声学学会杂志》84, 2262 - 2266(1988)]对凯利于 - 波特、沃森和福伊尔[《美国声学学会杂志》83, 1133 - 1145(1988)]写了一篇冗长的回应。在对帕斯托雷信件的这一回复中,讨论了他的几个论点,并报告了新的数据,这些数据支持了原文章的结论。该结论基本上是,听觉系统的时间敏锐度似乎并非语音或时间起始不同的非语音声音范畴感知的起源。