Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North LA-218, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Oct;16(4):405-415. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00774-8. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Emergency department (ED)-based naloxone distribution programs are a widespread harm reduction strategy. However, data describing the community penetrance of naloxone distributed from these programs are lacking. This study gauges acceptance of naloxone use and monitoring technology among people who use drugs (PWUD), and explores the use of real-time location systems (RTLS) in monitoring naloxone movements.
A prospective observational study was conducted on a convenience sample of individuals (N = 30) presenting to a tertiary-care academic medical center ED for an opioid-related complaint. A naloxone kit equipped with a low-energy Bluetooth (BLE) tracking system was employed to detect movement of naloxone off the hospital campus as a proxy for community penetrance, followed by a qualitative interview to gauge participant acceptance of naloxone use and monitoring technology.
Detection of BLE signals verified transit of 24 distributed naloxone kits off our hospital campus. Three participants whose BLE signals were not captured reported taking their kits with them following discharge, suggesting technological errors occurred; another three participants were lost to follow-up. Qualitative interviews demonstrated that participants accepted ED-based naloxone distribution programs and passive tracking technologies, but revealed concerns regarding hypothetical continuous monitoring systems and problematic interactions with first responders and law enforcement personnel.
Based on acquired BLE signals, 80% of dispensed naloxone kits left the hospital campus. Use of RTLS to passively geolocate naloxone rescue kits is feasible, but detection can be adversely affected by technological errors. PWUD are amenable to transient monitoring technologies but identified barriers to implementation.
基于急诊部的纳洛酮分发计划是一种广泛应用的减少伤害策略。然而,缺乏描述这些计划分发的纳洛酮在社区中的普及程度的数据。本研究评估了使用纳洛酮的接受度和监测技术在使用毒品的人群(PWUD)中的情况,并探讨了实时定位系统(RTLS)在监测纳洛酮运动中的应用。
对在三级保健学术医疗中心急诊部因阿片类药物相关投诉就诊的个体(N=30)进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。使用配备低能蓝牙(BLE)跟踪系统的纳洛酮套件来检测纳洛酮在离开医院校园后的运动情况,作为社区普及程度的代理指标,随后进行定性访谈,以评估参与者对纳洛酮使用和监测技术的接受程度。
BLE 信号的检测证实了 24 个分发的纳洛酮套件中有 24 个转移出了我们的医院校园。有 3 名参与者的 BLE 信号未被捕捉到,他们报告在出院后带着他们的套件离开,这表明可能发生了技术错误;另外 3 名参与者失去了联系。定性访谈表明,参与者接受了基于急诊部的纳洛酮分发计划和被动跟踪技术,但对假设的连续监测系统以及与急救人员和执法人员的潜在问题交互表示担忧。
根据获得的 BLE 信号,80%的分发的纳洛酮套件离开了医院校园。使用 RTLS 被动定位纳洛酮救援套件是可行的,但检测可能会受到技术错误的不利影响。PWUD 可以接受短暂的监测技术,但存在实施障碍。