Clin Lab. 2020 Apr 1;66(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190808.
This study sought to systematically assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum amyloid A (SAA) in gastric cancer (GC).
PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies. Extracted data were analyzed to determine diagnostic parameters and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to summarize the effects.
Six articles in English that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Meta-analysis of the included studies indicated high sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.89) and moderate specificity of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.55 - 0.67) of SAA, with a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 8.17 (95% CI: 4.82 - 13.86). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77. Survival analysis showed that SAA was associated with shorter survival time (HR = 4.42, p = 0.000; I2 = 0.0%). Stratified analyses showed that the assay of SAA from serum harbored higher efficacy than that from serum + plasma (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.77), and SAA testing also achieved a better diagnostic performance in Asians than in Caucasians (AUC: 0.77 vs. 0.50).
Collectively, our analyses suggest that SAA can be used as a clinical auxiliary reference index for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of GC; however, this diagnostic method is not independently sufficient. Our findings require confirmation in a larger prospective study.
本研究旨在系统评估血清淀粉样蛋白 A(SAA)在胃癌(GC)中的诊断和预后价值。
检索 PubMed、Embase、EBSCO、CNKI 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以获取合格的研究。提取的数据用于分析确定诊断参数和综合受试者工作特征(SROC)。汇总效应使用合并的危险比(HR)和优势比(OR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(95%CI)进行计算。
确定了 6 项符合纳入标准的英文文献。纳入研究的荟萃分析表明,SAA 的敏感性为 0.84(95%CI:0.77-0.89),特异性为 0.61(95%CI:0.55-0.67),诊断优势比(DOR)为 8.17(95%CI:4.82-13.86)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.77。生存分析表明,SAA 与较短的生存时间相关(HR=4.42,p=0.000;I2=0.0%)。分层分析表明,血清中 SAA 的检测比血清+血浆的检测效果更好(AUC:0.81 比 0.77),且 SAA 检测在亚洲人群中比在高加索人群中的诊断性能更好(AUC:0.77 比 0.50)。
总的来说,我们的分析表明,SAA 可以作为 GC 诊断和预后预测的临床辅助参考指标;然而,这种诊断方法并不独立充分。我们的研究结果需要在更大的前瞻性研究中得到证实。