Asao Shinichi, Hayes Lucy, Aspinwall Michael J, Rymer Paul D, Blackman Chris, Bryant Callum J, Cullerne Darren, Egerton John J G, Fan Yuzhen, Innes Peter, Millar A Harvey, Tucker Josephine, Shah Shahen, Wright Ian J, Yvon-Durocher Gabriel, Tissue David, Atkin Owen K
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Building 134, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
New Phytol. 2020 Aug;227(3):780-793. doi: 10.1111/nph.16579. Epub 2020 May 6.
We used a widely distributed tree Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. camaldulensis to partition intraspecific variation in leaf functional traits to genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity. We examined if genotypic variation is related to the climate of genotype provenance and whether phenotypic plasticity maintains performance in a changing environment. Ten genotypes from different climates were grown in a common garden under watering treatments reproducing the wettest and driest edges of the subspecies' distribution. We measured functional traits reflecting leaf metabolism and associated with growth (respiration rate, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, and leaf mass per area) and performance proxies (aboveground biomass and growth rate) each season over a year. Genotypic variation contributed substantially to the variation in aboveground biomass but much less in growth rate and leaf traits. Phenotypic plasticity was a large source of the variation in leaf traits and performance proxies and was greater among sampling dates than between watering treatments. The variation in leaf traits was weakly correlated to performance proxies, and both were unrelated to the climate of genotype provenance. Intraspecific variation in leaf traits arises similarly among genotypes in response to seasonal environmental variation, instead of long-term water availability or climate of genotype provenance.
我们使用广泛分布的树木——赤桉亚种赤桉(Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. camaldulensis)来将叶片功能性状的种内变异划分为基因型变异和表型可塑性。我们研究了基因型变异是否与基因型来源地的气候相关,以及表型可塑性是否能在变化的环境中维持性能。来自不同气候区的10个基因型在一个共同园地里种植,并进行浇水处理,以模拟该亚种分布最湿润和最干燥边缘的情况。在一年中的每个季节,我们测量了反映叶片代谢并与生长相关的功能性状(呼吸速率、氮和磷浓度以及单位面积叶质量)以及性能指标(地上生物量和生长速率)。基因型变异对地上生物量的变异贡献很大,但对生长速率和叶片性状的贡献要小得多。表型可塑性是叶片性状和性能指标变异的一个重要来源,并且在采样日期之间比在浇水处理之间更大。叶片性状的变异与性能指标的相关性较弱,并且两者均与基因型来源地的气候无关。叶片性状的种内变异在基因型之间对季节性环境变异的响应方式相似,而不是对长期水分可利用性或基因型来源地气候的响应。