Research Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (UiL-OTS), Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):247-269. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00069.
Purpose Applying evidence-based grammar intervention can be challenging for speech and language therapists (SLTs). Language in Interaction Therapy (LIT) is a focused stimulation intervention for children with weak morphosyntactic skills, which was developed to support SLTs in incorporating results from effect studies in daily practice. The aims of this Clinical Focus are (a) to explain the principles and elements of LIT and stimulate use in daily SLT practice and (b) to describe the effects of LIT on morphosyntactic skills of 4- to 5-year-olds in special education, compared to usual care. Method With a description of LIT, we provide guidance to implement evidence-based intervention. Important elements are as follows: proper selection of therapy goals, language facilitating techniques, child-centered and clinician-directed elements, and the use of scripts. Our focus in the description is on the support and practical solutions LIT tries to provide to SLTs. We also explored the implementation of LIT in special education, to improve morphosyntax in 4- and 5-year-old children. We provided SLTs with training and designed protocols for each therapy session. The effects of LIT were measured in a single-case A-B design, repeated in five children with developmental language disorders (ages 4;2-5;7 [years;months]). Conclusion We conclude that implementation of LIT is possible if LIT is enriched with support in goal selection, protocols to guide therapy sessions, and training and coaching. In the single-case study, four children showed more growth in mean length of utterance during and directly following the LIT intervention phase, compared to the baseline phase with usual care, and in two of them, this difference was significant. The grammatical complexity measure "TARSP-P" showed an overall significantly higher score at group level during LIT, but limited effects on an individual level.
目的
对于言语治疗师(SLT)来说,应用基于证据的语法干预可能具有挑战性。互动疗法中的语言(LIT)是一种针对形态句法技能较弱的儿童的集中刺激干预方法,旨在支持 SLT 将效应研究结果纳入日常实践。本临床焦点的目的是:(a) 解释 LIT 的原则和要素,并激发其在 SLT 日常实践中的应用;(b) 描述 LIT 对特殊教育中 4 至 5 岁儿童形态句法技能的影响,与常规护理相比。
方法
通过描述 LIT,我们为实施基于证据的干预提供指导。重要的要素如下:适当选择治疗目标、促进语言的技术、以儿童为中心和以临床医生为导向的要素,以及脚本的使用。我们在描述中的重点是 LIT 试图为 SLT 提供的支持和实用解决方案。我们还探讨了 LIT 在特殊教育中的实施,以提高 4 至 5 岁儿童的形态句法。我们为 SLT 提供了培训,并为每个治疗课程设计了方案。在单个案例 A-B 设计中,对五名发育性语言障碍儿童(年龄分别为 4;2-5;7[年;月])重复进行了 LIT 的效果测量。
结论
如果在目标选择、指导治疗课程的方案、培训和指导方面为 LIT 提供支持,那么 LIT 的实施是可行的。在单案例研究中,与常规护理的基线阶段相比,有四个儿童在 LIT 干预阶段和直接后续阶段的平均话语长度有了更多的增长,其中两个儿童的差异具有统计学意义。语法复杂度测量“TARSP-P”在 LIT 期间在组水平上显示出整体显著更高的得分,但在个体水平上的效果有限。