Yang Guiying, Bao Xiaohang, Peng Jing, Li Jie, Yan Guangming, Jing Sheng, Li Hong, Duan Guangyou
Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 18;13:555-563. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S229566. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to compare the analgesic outcomes between primary and repeated cesarean delivery.
We performed a retrospective analysis based on the medical records of a teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to March 2019. We collected data on demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, anesthesia, and surgical factors for cesarean delivery patients. We also recorded the postoperative analgesic strategy, pain intensity (assessed by the number rating scale) during the first 48 hrs after surgery, hospital cost, and hospital stay. Postoperative inadequate analgesia was defined by a score of ≥ 4 in the number rating scale. Analgesic outcomes after cesarean delivery between primiparas and multiparas were compared using propensity score matching analysis. Moreover, subgroup logistic analysis for different age groups (≥ 35 and < 35 years) was performed to investigate the effect of the maternal category on postoperative inadequate analgesia.
A total of 1543 patients were included in the analysis and 571 pairs (1142 patients) were matched in the primiparas and multiparaparas group according to their propensity score. In both the non-matched and matched cohort, the incidence of inadequate analgesia in the primiparas group was lower than that in the multiparas group (16.7% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.001 and 16.1% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.002; respectively). The multiparas group was identified as being at risk of inadequate analgesia after cesarean delivery in both age groups (age ≥ 35 years, odds ratio: 2.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-3.95; age < 35 years, odds ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.89).
Multiparas that undergo a repeat cesarean delivery had a significantly higher risk of inadequate postoperative pain treatment than primiparas. The maternal category should be considered when formulating the postoperative analgesia strategy after cesarean delivery.
本研究旨在比较初次剖宫产和再次剖宫产的镇痛效果。
我们基于中国一家教学医院2018年1月至2019年3月的病历进行了回顾性分析。我们收集了剖宫产患者的人口统计学特征、围手术期并发症、麻醉和手术因素的数据。我们还记录了术后镇痛策略、术后48小时内的疼痛强度(采用数字评分量表评估)、住院费用和住院时间。术后镇痛不足定义为数字评分量表得分≥4分。采用倾向得分匹配分析比较初产妇和经产妇剖宫产术后的镇痛效果。此外,对不同年龄组(≥35岁和<35岁)进行亚组逻辑分析,以研究产妇类别对术后镇痛不足的影响。
共有1543例患者纳入分析,根据倾向得分在初产妇和经产妇组中匹配了571对(1142例患者)。在未匹配和匹配队列中,初产妇组镇痛不足的发生率均低于经产妇组(分别为16.7%对24.0%,P<0.001;16.1%对23.5%,P = 0.002)。在两个年龄组中,经产妇组均被确定为剖宫产术后镇痛不足的风险人群(年龄≥35岁,比值比:2.18,95%置信区间:1.20 - 3.95;年龄<35岁,比值比:1.43,95%置信区间1.08 - 1.89)。
接受再次剖宫产的经产妇术后疼痛治疗不足的风险显著高于初产妇。在制定剖宫产术后镇痛策略时应考虑产妇类别。