Hall Zachary J, Tropepe Vincent
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Neuroanat. 2020 Mar 18;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
Traditionally, the impact of evolution on the central nervous system has been studied by comparing the sizes of brain regions between species. However, more recent work has demonstrated that environmental factors, such as sensory experience, modulate brain region sizes intraspecifically, clouding the distinction between evolutionary and environmental sources of neuroanatomical variation in a sampled brain. Here, we review how teleost fish have played a central role in shaping this traditional understanding of brain structure evolution between species as well as the capacity for the environment to shape brain structure similarly within a species. By demonstrating that variation measured by brain region size varies similarly both inter- and intraspecifically, work on teleosts highlights the depth of the problem of studying brain evolution using neuroanatomy alone: even neurogenesis, the primary mechanism through which brain regions are thought to change size between species, also mediates experience-dependent changes within species. Here, we argue that teleost models also offer a solution to this overreliance on neuroanatomy in the study of brain evolution. With the advent of work on teleosts demonstrating interspecific evolutionary signatures in embryonic gene expression and the growing understanding of developmental neurogenesis as a multi-stepped process that may be differentially regulated between species, we argue that the tools are now in place to reframe how we compare brains between species. Future research can now transcend neuroanatomy to leverage the experimental utility of teleost fishes in order to gain deeper neurobiological insight to help us discern developmental signatures of evolutionary adaptation from phenotypic plasticity.
传统上,进化对中枢神经系统的影响是通过比较不同物种间脑区的大小来研究的。然而,最近的研究表明,环境因素,如感官体验,会在种内调节脑区大小,这使得在一个抽样大脑中,神经解剖变异的进化来源和环境来源之间的区别变得模糊。在这里,我们回顾了硬骨鱼在塑造这种对物种间脑结构进化的传统理解以及环境在种内塑造脑结构的能力方面如何发挥核心作用。通过证明用脑区大小测量的变异在种间和种内的变化相似,关于硬骨鱼的研究突出了仅使用神经解剖学研究脑进化问题的深度:即使是神经发生,这一被认为是物种间脑区大小变化的主要机制,也介导了种内依赖经验的变化。在这里,我们认为硬骨鱼模型也为脑进化研究中过度依赖神经解剖学的问题提供了解决方案。随着关于硬骨鱼的研究表明胚胎基因表达中的种间进化特征,以及对发育神经发生作为一个多步骤过程的理解不断加深,这个过程可能在不同物种间受到不同调节,我们认为现在已经具备了重新构建我们比较物种间大脑方式的工具。未来的研究现在可以超越神经解剖学,利用硬骨鱼的实验效用,以获得更深入的神经生物学见解,帮助我们从表型可塑性中辨别进化适应的发育特征。