Zecchin Massimo, Solimene Francesco, D'Onofrio Antonio, Zanotto Gabriele, Iacopino Saverio, Pignalberi Carlo, Calvi Valeria, Maglia Giampiero, Della Bella Paolo, Quartieri Fabio, Curnis Antonio, Biffi Mauro, Capucci Alessandro, Caravati Fabrizio, Senatore Gaetano, Santamaria Matteo, Lissoni Fabio, Manzo Michele, Marini Massimiliano, Giammaria Massimo, Rapacciuolo Antonio, Sinagra Gianfranco, Giacopelli Daniele, Gargaro Alessio, Pisanò Ennio C
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Trieste Italy.
Clinica Montevergine Mercogliano Italy.
J Arrhythm. 2020 Mar 2;36(2):353-362. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12319. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Parameters measured during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant also depend on bioelectrical properties of the myocardium. We aimed to explore their potential association with clinical outcomes in patients with single/dual-chamber ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).
In the framework of the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance, baseline electrical parameters for all implanted leads were compared by the occurrence of all-cause mortality, adjudicated ventricular arrhythmia (VA), and atrial high-rate episode lasting ≥24 hours (24 h AHRE).
In a cohort of 2976 patients (58.1% ICD) with a median follow-up of 25 months, event rates were 3.1/100 patient-years for all-cause mortality, 18.1/100 patient-years for VA, and 9.3/100 patient-years for 24 h AHRE. At univariate analysis, baseline shock impedance was consistently lower in groups with events than without, with a 40 Ω cutoff that better identified high-risk patients. However, at multivariable analysis, the adjusted-hazard ratios (HRs) lost statistical significance for any endpoint. Baseline atrial sensing amplitude during sinus rhythm was lower in patients with 24 h AHRE than in those without (2.45 [IQR: 1.65-3.85] vs 3.51 [IQR: 2.37-4.67] mV, < .01). The adjusted HR for 24 h AHRE in patients with atrial sensing >1.5 mV vs those with values ≤1.5 mV was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.33-0.83), = .006.
Although lower baseline shock impedance was observed in patients with events, the association lost statistical significance at multivariable analysis. Conversely, low sinus rhythm atrial sensing (≤1.5 mV) measured with standard transvenous leads could identify subjects at high risk of atrial arrhythmia.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入过程中测量的参数也取决于心肌的生物电特性。我们旨在探讨它们与单腔/双腔ICD及心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者临床结局的潜在关联。
在家庭监测专家联盟的框架内,通过全因死亡率、判定的室性心律失常(VA)以及持续≥24小时的房性快速性心律失常发作(24小时AHRE)的发生情况,比较所有植入导联的基线电参数。
在2976例患者(58.1%为ICD)的队列中,中位随访时间为25个月,全因死亡率的事件发生率为3.1/100患者年,VA为18.1/100患者年,24小时AHRE为9.3/100患者年。在单变量分析中,发生事件的组的基线电击阻抗始终低于未发生事件的组,以40Ω为界值能更好地识别高危患者。然而,在多变量分析中,调整后的风险比(HRs)对任何终点均失去统计学意义。发生24小时AHRE的患者窦性心律时的基线心房感知幅度低于未发生者(2.45[四分位间距:1.65 - 3.85]对3.51[四分位间距:2.37 - 4.67]mV,P <.01)。心房感知>1.5 mV的患者与≤1.5 mV的患者相比,24小时AHRE的调整后HR为0.52(95%可信区间:0.33 - 0.83),P =.006。
尽管发生事件的患者观察到较低的基线电击阻抗,但在多变量分析中这种关联失去了统计学意义。相反,用标准经静脉导联测量的低窦性心律心房感知(≤1.5 mV)可识别房性心律失常高危患者。