Suppr超能文献

三种不同来源的ICR小鼠肉毒杆菌毒素肌肉注射反应的比较研究。

Comparison study of the response with botulinum toxin muscle injection in the ICR mice from three different sources.

作者信息

Seo Min-Soo, Kim Young-In, Kang Kyung-Ku, Oh Se-Kyung, Sung Soo-Eun, Jung Young-Suk, Cho Joon Yong, Song HyunKeun, Hwang Dae Youn, Park Sang-Joon, Kim Kil Soo

机构信息

1Laboratory Animal Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu, Korea.

KPC Coporation, Gwangju, 12773 Korea.

出版信息

Lab Anim Res. 2019 Jul 26;35:11. doi: 10.1186/s42826-019-0010-4. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Botulinum-toxin A (BoNT/A) is a widely used not only for cosmetics but also for various experimental purposes including muscle-related research. In this study, we applied BoNT/A to mouse muscle of three different sources to compare and evaluate the biological and pathological response. The three different mouse sources consist of Korl:ICR (Korea FDA source), A:ICR (USA source) and B:ICR (Japan source) which were purchased from each different vendors. To compare the responses of ICR mice with BoNT/A muscle injection, we examined the body weight, hematological and serum biochemistry analysis. Also, we evaluated the muscle change by histopathological analysis and gene expression patterns of muscle-related target by qPCR. The body weight gain was decreased in the BoNT/A-treated group compared with the control group. In clinical pathologic analysis and gene expression patterns, the data showed that the responses in the BoNT/A-treated group were similar compared with the control group. Decreased muscle fiber was observed in BoNT/A-treated group compared with control group, while Korl:ICR showed a little low response with the other mouse sources. In conclusion, our results suggest that three different sources ICR mice (Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR) have a similar biological and pathological responses in BoNT/A muscle injection.

摘要

肉毒杆菌毒素A(BoNT/A)不仅广泛应用于化妆品领域,还用于包括肌肉相关研究在内的各种实验目的。在本研究中,我们将BoNT/A应用于三种不同来源的小鼠肌肉,以比较和评估其生物学和病理学反应。这三种不同的小鼠来源包括从不同供应商处购买的Korl:ICR(韩国食品药品监督管理局来源)、A:ICR(美国来源)和B:ICR(日本来源)。为了比较BoNT/A肌肉注射对ICR小鼠的反应,我们检测了体重、血液学和血清生化分析。此外,我们通过组织病理学分析评估了肌肉变化,并通过qPCR检测了肌肉相关靶点的基因表达模式。与对照组相比,BoNT/A治疗组的体重增加减少。在临床病理分析和基因表达模式方面,数据显示BoNT/A治疗组与对照组的反应相似。与对照组相比,BoNT/A治疗组观察到肌纤维减少,而Korl:ICR与其他小鼠来源相比反应略低。总之,我们的结果表明,三种不同来源的ICR小鼠(Korl:ICR、A:ICR和B:ICR)在BoNT/A肌肉注射中具有相似的生物学和病理学反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebad/7081521/b05be1b70012/42826_2019_10_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验