Davidson Natalie, Grigg Matthew J, Mcguinness Sarah L, Baird Robert J, Anstey Nicholas M
Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 16;7(4):ofaa090. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa090. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Tropical Australia has a high incidence of nocardiosis, with high rates of intrinsic antimicrobial resistance. Linezolid, the only antimicrobial to which all local species are susceptible, has been recommended in empirical combination treatment regimens for moderate-severe infections at Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) since 2014. We report the safety and efficacy of linezolid use for nocardiosis in this setting.
We identified cases through a retrospective review of all RDH isolates from December 2014 to August 2018 and included 5 linezolid-treated cases from a previous cohort. Laboratory, demographic, and clinical data were included in the primary analysis of safety and treatment outcomes.
Between 2014 and 2018, was isolated from 35 individuals; 28 (80%) had clinically significant infection and 23 (82%) received treatment. All isolates were linezolid-susceptible. Safety and efficacy were assessed for 20 patients receiving linezolid-containing regimens and 8 receiving nonlinezolid regimens. Median linezolid induction therapy duration was 28 days. Common adverse effects in those receiving linezolid were thrombocytopenia (45%) and anemia (40%). Adverse events prompted discontinuation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole more often than linezolid (40% vs 20%). Linezolid therapeutic drug monitoring was used in 1 patient, with successful dose reduction and outcome. There was no difference in 30-day survival between those treated with linezolid (90%) vs no linezolid (87%). One -attributed death occurred during linezolid therapy.
Linezolid is safe and efficacious in empirical treatment for moderate to severe nocardiosis in a monitored hospital setting, with 100% drug susceptibility and no difference in adverse events or outcomes compared with nonlinezolid regimens.
澳大利亚热带地区诺卡菌病发病率高,固有抗菌药物耐药率也高。利奈唑胺是唯一对当地所有菌种均敏感的抗菌药物,自2014年以来,皇家达尔文医院(RDH)在中重度感染的经验性联合治疗方案中一直推荐使用。我们报告了在这种情况下使用利奈唑胺治疗诺卡菌病的安全性和有效性。
我们通过回顾性分析2014年12月至2018年8月RDH的所有分离株来确定病例,并纳入了先前队列中5例接受利奈唑胺治疗的病例。实验室、人口统计学和临床数据纳入安全性和治疗结果的初步分析。
2014年至2018年期间,从35名个体中分离出菌株;28例(80%)有临床显著感染,23例(82%)接受了治疗。所有分离株对利奈唑胺敏感。对20例接受含利奈唑胺方案治疗的患者和8例接受非利奈唑胺方案治疗的患者进行了安全性和有效性评估。利奈唑胺诱导治疗的中位持续时间为28天。接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者常见不良反应为血小板减少(45%)和贫血(40%)。不良事件导致停用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的情况比停用利奈唑胺更常见(40%对20%)。1例患者使用了利奈唑胺治疗药物监测,成功降低了剂量并取得了良好结果。接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者30天生存率(90%)与未接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者(87%)无差异。利奈唑胺治疗期间发生1例与药物相关的死亡。
在有监测的医院环境中,利奈唑胺用于中重度诺卡菌病的经验性治疗是安全有效的,药物敏感性为100%,与非利奈唑胺方案相比,不良事件或治疗结果无差异。