• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌微创食管切除术的术后并发症

Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Ozawa Soji, Koyanagi Kazuo, Ninomiya Yamato, Yatabe Kentaro, Higuchi Tadashi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 12;4(2):126-134. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12315. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/ags3.12315
PMID:32258977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7105848/
Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been performed increasingly more frequently for the treatment of esophageal cancer, ever since it was first described in 1992. However, the incidence of postoperative complications of MIE has not yet been well-characterized, because (a) there are few reports of studies with a sufficient sample size, (b) a variety of minimally invasive surgical techniques are used, and (c) there are few reports in which an established system for classifying the severity of complications is examined. According to an analysis performed by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group, the most common complications of MIE are pneumonia, arrhythmia, anastomotic leakage, conduit necrosis, chylothorax, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Therefore, we decided to focus on these complications. We selected 48 out of 1245 reports of studies (a) that included more than 50 patients each, (b) in which the esophagectomy technique used was clearly described, and (c) in which the complications were adequately described. The overall incidences of the postoperative complications of MIE for esophageal cancer were analyzed according to the MIE technique adopted, that is, McKeown MIE, Ivor Lewis MIE, robotic-assisted McKeown MIE, robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis MIE, or mediastinoscopic transmediastinal esophagectomy. Pneumonia, arrhythmia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred at an incidence rate of about 10% each; Ivor Lewis MIE was associated with a relatively low incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. It is important to recognize that the incidences of complications of MIE are influenced by the MIE technique adopted and the extent of lymph node dissection.

摘要

自1992年首次被描述以来,微创食管切除术(MIE)在食管癌治疗中的应用越来越频繁。然而,MIE术后并发症的发生率尚未得到充分描述,原因如下:(a)样本量充足的研究报告较少;(b)使用了多种微创外科技术;(c)很少有报告对已建立的并发症严重程度分类系统进行研究。根据食管并发症共识小组的分析,MIE最常见的并发症是肺炎、心律失常、吻合口漏、管道坏死、乳糜胸和喉返神经麻痹。因此,我们决定关注这些并发症。我们从1245篇研究报告中筛选出48篇,这些报告需满足以下条件:(a)每项研究纳入的患者超过50例;(b)明确描述了所采用的食管切除技术;(c)对并发症进行了充分描述。根据所采用的MIE技术,即麦克尤恩MIE、艾弗·刘易斯MIE、机器人辅助麦克尤恩MIE、机器人辅助艾弗·刘易斯MIE或纵隔镜经纵隔食管切除术,分析了MIE治疗食管癌术后并发症的总体发生率。肺炎、心律失常、吻合口漏和喉返神经麻痹的发生率均约为10%;艾弗·刘易斯MIE的喉返神经麻痹发生率相对较低。必须认识到,MIE并发症的发生率受所采用的MIE技术和淋巴结清扫范围的影响。

相似文献

1
Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌微创食管切除术的术后并发症
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 12;4(2):126-134. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12315. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].[微创Ivor-Lewis与微创McKeown食管癌切除术围手术期并发症的临床观察]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
3
McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.麦克尤恩或艾弗·刘易斯式完全微创食管癌和胃食管交界癌切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.173.
4
A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown微创食管切除术短期疗效的比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2352-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.15.
5
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients.根据肿瘤位置进行的微创食管癌切除术:251例患者的经验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Apr 1;17:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.03.038. eCollection 2017 May.
6
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.微创食管切除术围手术期并发症的标准化比较:Ivor Lewis 与 McKeown 术式。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
8
McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.麦基翁或艾弗·刘易斯微创食管切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1518-1527. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.45.
9
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.倾向性评分匹配分析比较微创 Ivor Lewis 与微创 McKeown 食管切除术。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):128-133. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002982.
10
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of preoperative diastolic dysfunction on short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).术前舒张功能障碍对机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)短期预后的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 1;19(1):442. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02624-7.
2
Surgical Timing and Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: Insights from One- and Two-Stage Esophagectomies in a Polish Cohort.食管癌的手术时机与预后:波兰队列中一期和二期食管切除术的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124301.
3
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience.单孔与四孔胸腔镜食管癌切除术患者的比较结果:单中心经验
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02244-8.
4
The comparison of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophageal cancer: a propensity-weighted analysis.单孔与多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗食管癌的比较:倾向加权分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1730-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11511-5. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Essential updates 2022/2023: Recent advances in perioperative management of esophagectomy to improve operative outcomes.2022/2023年重要更新:食管癌切除术围手术期管理的最新进展以改善手术效果。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jul 29;8(6):966-976. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12847. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Modification of the lesser curvature incision line enhanced gastric conduit perfusion as determined by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and decreased the incidence of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.通过吲哚菁绿荧光成像确定,小弯切口线的改良增强了胃管道灌注,并降低了食管切除术后吻合口漏的发生率。
Esophagus. 2025 Jan;22(1):68-76. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01089-1. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
7
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (NST 1502): a multicenter prospective cohort study.可切除胸段食管癌的微创与开放食管切除术(NST 1502):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2023 Feb 10;3(2):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Comparative study of acute and chronic pain after inflatable videoasisted MediastinoscopicTranshiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive McKeown Esophagectomy:A propensity score matching analysis.充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术与微创麦基翁食管切除术后急慢性疼痛的比较研究:倾向评分匹配分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33477. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33477. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
9
Changes in and clinical utility of maximum phonation time and repetitive saliva swallowing test scores after esophagectomy.食管切除术后最大发声时间和重复唾液吞咽试验评分的变化及临床应用。
Esophagus. 2024 Jul;21(3):348-356. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01065-9. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
Comment on The Association Between Preoperative Inspiratory Muscle Training Variables and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Subjects With Esophageal Cancer.关于食管癌患者术前吸气肌训练变量与术后肺部并发症之间关联的评论
Respir Care. 2024 Feb 28;69(3):376-378. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11744.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving changes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-institution experience.微创食管切除术的演变:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2503-2511. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07057-6. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Thoracic Duct Resection During Esophagectomy Does Not Contribute to Improved Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched-Cohort Study.胸导管切除术在食管癌中的应用并未改善食管鳞癌患者的预后:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):4053-4061. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07627-x. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
4
Prophylactic Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Increases Postoperative Complications and Does Not Improve Survival.预防性颈淋巴结清扫术在胸腔镜食管癌根治术中增加术后并发症,但不能提高生存率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2899-2904. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07499-1. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.微创与机器人辅助食管切除术的对比结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):814-820. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06834-7. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2012.2012年日本食管癌综合登记
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):221-245. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00674-z. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database.开放与微创 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术治疗癌症的结局:NSQIP 数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;26(7):2001-2010. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07319-6. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.三维电视辅助胸腔镜手术在食管癌患者中的应用价值。
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):272-277. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00661-4. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study.侧卧位双肺通气与传统开胸术在 Ivor Lewis 手术中的比较:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):142-152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06742-w. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助与胸腔镜辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的早期结果:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1284-1291. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07273-3. Epub 2019 Mar 6.