• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对体细胞肿瘤检测存在突变的患者进行种系检测。

Germline Testing for Patients With Mutations on Somatic Tumor Testing.

作者信息

Vlessis Katherine, Purington Natasha, Chun Nicolette, Haraldsdottir Sigurdis, Ford James M

机构信息

See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Nov 11;4(1):pkz095. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz095. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkz095
PMID:32259017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends germline testing for pathogenic mutations identified by somatic tumor sequencing. The aim of this study was to explore whether patients at Stanford with somatic mutations were recommended germline testing in accordance with NCCN guidelines.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected all Stanford patients with mutations found by tumor sequencing. Medical records were reviewed for each patient to identify those recommended germline testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit associating baseline characteristics with whether or not a recommendation was made.

RESULTS

Of 164 participants, 51 (31.1%) had no recommendation for germline testing. Of the 97 available germline-testing results, 54 (55.7%) were positive for pathogenic mutations. After adjusting for possible confounders, patients with genitourinary cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00 to 0.03; =.003), lung cancer (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.21; <.001), sarcoma (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.14; <.001), skin cancer (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.03; =.002), or "other" diagnoses (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.16; <.001) were statistically significantly less likely to be recommended germline testing compared with patients with breast or gynecological cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the importance of provider education outside of the oncologic specialties typically associated with -related cancers and continued exploration of referrals to genetics for germline testing on the basis of somatic findings.

摘要

背景

美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)建议对通过体细胞肿瘤测序鉴定出的致病突变进行胚系检测。本研究的目的是探讨斯坦福大学患有体细胞突变的患者是否按照NCCN指南接受了胚系检测。

方法

我们回顾性收集了所有通过肿瘤测序发现有突变的斯坦福大学患者。对每位患者的病历进行审查,以确定那些被推荐进行胚系检测的患者。建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,将基线特征与是否有检测推荐联系起来。

结果

在164名参与者中,51名(31.1%)未被推荐进行胚系检测。在97份可用的胚系检测结果中,54份(55.7%)致病突变呈阳性。在对可能的混杂因素进行调整后,与患有乳腺癌或妇科癌症的患者相比,患有泌尿生殖系统癌症(比值比[OR]=0.03,95%置信区间[CI]=0.00至0.03;P=0.003)、肺癌(OR=0.04,95%CI=0.01至0.21;P<0.001)、肉瘤(OR=0.02,95%CI=0.00至0.14;P<0.001)、皮肤癌(OR=0.01,95%CI=0.98至1.03;P=0.002)或“其他”诊断(OR=0.01,95%CI=从0.00至0.16;P<0.001)的患者接受胚系检测的可能性在统计学上显著降低。

结论

我们的研究强调了在通常与癌症相关的肿瘤学专业之外对医疗服务提供者进行教育的重要性,以及继续探索根据体细胞检测结果将患者转诊至遗传学专业进行胚系检测的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/26eca6077227/pkz095f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/203d443504bb/pkz095f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/19e6c0401533/pkz095f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/26eca6077227/pkz095f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/203d443504bb/pkz095f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/19e6c0401533/pkz095f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a036/7043298/26eca6077227/pkz095f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Germline Testing for Patients With Mutations on Somatic Tumor Testing.对体细胞肿瘤检测存在突变的患者进行种系检测。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Nov 11;4(1):pkz095. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz095. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Germline and Somatic Mutations in 172 Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.172例中国上皮性卵巢癌女性患者的生殖系和体细胞突变
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;10:295. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00295. eCollection 2020.
3
Simultaneous germline and somatic sequencing in ovarian carcinoma: mutation rate and impact on clinical decision-making.卵巢癌中胚系和体细胞的同步测序:突变率及其对临床决策的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):517-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
4
Uptake and timing of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变患者的风险降低输卵管卵巢切除术的吸收和时机。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):508.e1-508.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.070. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Identifying disparities in germline and somatic testing for ovarian cancer.识别卵巢癌种系和体细胞检测中的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
The performance of BRCA1 immunohistochemistry for detecting germline, somatic, and epigenetic BRCA1 loss in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.在高级别浆液性卵巢癌中,BRCA1免疫组化检测种系、体细胞和表观遗传BRCA1缺失的性能。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2372-2378. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu461. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Analysis of Germline Mutations in Chinese Prostate Cancer Patients.中国前列腺癌患者种系突变分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 17;12:746102. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.746102. eCollection 2022.
8
Routine Plasma-Based Genotyping to Comprehensively Detect Germline, Somatic, and Reversion Mutations among Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.常规基于血浆的基因分型,全面检测晚期实体瘤患者的种系、体细胞和回复性突变。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;26(11):2546-2555. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2933. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
Comparable frequency of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutations in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort suggests TP53 screening should be offered together with BRCA1/2 screening to early-onset breast cancer patients.在一个多民族亚洲队列中,BRCA1、BRCA2 和 TP53 种系突变的频率相当,这表明应向早发性乳腺癌患者提供与 BRCA1/2 筛查相结合的 TP53 筛查。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 16;14(2):R66. doi: 10.1186/bcr3172.
10
Overall Survival and Clinical Characteristics of BRCA-Associated Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.BRCA相关胆管癌的总生存期及临床特征:一项多中心回顾性研究
Oncologist. 2017 Jul;22(7):804-810. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0415. Epub 2017 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Case report: olaparib use in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with pathogenic variant.病例报告:使用奥拉帕利治疗携带致病性变异的转移性肺腺癌。
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2022 Dec 28;8(7). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a006223. Print 2022 Dec.
2
Concordance Between Genomic Alterations Detected by Tumor and Germline Sequencing: Results from a Tertiary Care Academic Center Molecular Tumor Board.肿瘤和胚系测序检测到的基因组改变的一致性:来自三级护理学术中心分子肿瘤委员会的结果。
Oncologist. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac164.
3
Preoperational diagnosis and management of breast ductal carcinoma arising within fibroadenoma: Two case reports.

本文引用的文献

1
Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.肿瘤测序的胚系分析:来自 ESMO 精准医学工作组的建议。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1221-1231. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz136.
2
Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Gynecologic Cancer Care.妇科癌症护理中的种系和体细胞肿瘤检测。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019 Mar;46(1):37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.09.003.
3
Inference of Germline Mutational Status and Evaluation of Loss of Heterozygosity in High-Depth, Tumor-Only Sequencing Data.
纤维腺瘤内发生的乳腺导管癌的术前诊断与处理:两例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 16;10(11):3496-3504. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i11.3496.
4
Identification and Management of Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in a Tumor-Only Genomic Testing Program.仅肿瘤组织基因组检测项目中 BRCA1、BRCA2 和 PALB2 种致病性变异的识别与管理。
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 1;28(11):2349-2360. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2861.
5
PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers.PARP抑制剂:内分泌受体阳性乳腺癌的一种主要治疗选择。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;14(3):599. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030599.
6
Implementation of Multigene Germline and Parallel Somatic Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: SIGNPOST Study.多基因种系和并行体细胞基因检测在上皮性卵巢癌中的应用:SIGNPOST研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;13(17):4344. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174344.
7
The Future of Parallel Tumor and Germline Genetic Testing: Is There a Role for All Patients With Cancer?平行肿瘤和种系遗传检测的未来:所有癌症患者都有必要进行检测吗?
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jul 28;19(7):871-878. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7044.
8
Prostate Cancer in 2021: Novelties in Prognostic and Therapeutic Biomarker Evaluation.2021年前列腺癌:预后和治疗生物标志物评估的新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 11;13(14):3471. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143471.
9
Paired tumor sequencing and germline testing in breast cancer management: An experience of a single academic center.乳腺癌管理中的配对肿瘤测序和种系检测:单中心经验。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;3(6):e1287. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1287. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
仅肿瘤深度测序数据中种系突变状态的推断及杂合性缺失的评估
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00148. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
The emerging significance of secondary germline testing in cancer genomics.肿瘤基因组学中胚系二次检测的新兴意义。
J Pathol. 2018 Apr;244(5):610-615. doi: 10.1002/path.5031. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Precision medicine in heritable cancer: when somatic tumour testing and germline mutations meet.遗传性癌症中的精准医学:当体细胞肿瘤检测与种系突变相遇时。
NPJ Genom Med. 2016 Jan 13;1:15006. doi: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2015.6. eCollection 2016.
6
Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.通过对肿瘤和正常DNA中癌症相关基因进行通用测序与基于指南的种系检测对晚期癌症患者进行突变检测
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):825-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11137.
7
Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists.癌症序列变异解读与报告的标准和指南:分子病理学协会、美国临床肿瘤学会和美国病理学家学会联合共识推荐
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;19(1):4-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002.
8
Germline Findings in Tumor-Only Sequencing: Points to Consider for Clinicians and Laboratories.仅肿瘤测序中的种系发现:临床医生和实验室需考虑的要点
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 20;108(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv351. Print 2016 Apr.
9
Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA.利用配对正常 DNA 进行靶向肿瘤测序中的种系变异。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):104-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5208.
10
Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation.用于癌症突变发现与解读的个性化基因组分析。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283ra53. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7161.