Rose Paul E, Croft Darren P
Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, Washington Singer, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom; WWT, Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire, GL2 7BT, United Kingdom.
Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, Washington Singer, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom.
Behav Processes. 2020 Jun;175:104118. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104118. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
Flamingos are well known for their gregarious habits and aggregations in large flocks, but evaluation of the mechanisms behind social grouping remain poorly understood. Captive birds provide a useful model for investigating aspects of social choice in highly gregarious, long-lived species. Animals invest in social relationships that convey fitness benefits and bonds can be long-lasting. For some species, field-based measurement of social networks can be difficult. Captive populations therefore provide a useful alternative for measuring social choices. Data were collected on flamingos at WWT Slimbridge Wetland Centre from 2013 to 2016 and compared to data from 2012. For three flocks, associations were analysed along with individual foot health scores to identify any relationship between health and social behaviour. Long-term partnerships were present in all flocks; preferred associates noted in 2012 were present in 2016. Matrix correlations across years were positive; arrangements of dyads, trios and quartets with higher ties strengths were visible at the beginning and end of the study. Both male-male and female-female bonds were stable over time. All flamingos were more frequently seen socialising than solitary; those in the largest flock showed the highest occurrence of social behaviour (irrespective of enclosure size differences). The number of connections realised from all available within a network was significantly influenced by season. Foot health did not predict associations in these three flamingo networks. Our results indicate that flamingo societies are complex (i.e. formed of long-standing preferential partnerships and not loose, random connections) and the impact of flock size and environment on sociality should be investigated further. These results are helpful for those working with captive flamingos to consider the number of birds housed so that an array of opportunities for choice of associate and/or breeding partner are available in zoo-housed flocks.
火烈鸟以其群居习性和大群聚集而闻名,但对其社会群体形成背后机制的评估仍知之甚少。圈养鸟类为研究高度群居、长寿物种的社会选择方面提供了一个有用的模型。动物会投入到能带来健康益处的社会关系中,这种关系可以持久。对于一些物种来说,实地测量社会网络可能很困难。因此,圈养种群为测量社会选择提供了一个有用的替代方法。2013年至2016年在WWT斯利姆布里奇湿地中心收集了火烈鸟的数据,并与2012年的数据进行了比较。对于三个鸟群,分析了它们之间的关联以及个体足部健康评分,以确定健康与社会行为之间是否存在任何关系。所有鸟群中都存在长期伙伴关系;2012年记录的偏好伙伴在2016年依然存在。多年间的矩阵相关性为正;在研究开始和结束时,可以看到具有较高联系强度的二元组、三元组和四元组的组合。雄性与雄性以及雌性与雌性之间的关系随着时间推移都很稳定。所有火烈鸟社交的频率都高于独处;最大鸟群中的火烈鸟表现出最高的社交行为发生率(与围栏大小差异无关)。网络中所有可用连接的数量受到季节的显著影响。在这三个火烈鸟网络中,足部健康并不能预测它们之间的关联。我们的结果表明,火烈鸟社会是复杂的(即由长期的偏好伙伴关系组成,而非松散、随机的联系),群大小和环境对社交性影响应进一步研究。这些结果有助于那些从事圈养火烈鸟工作的人员考虑圈养鸟类数量,以便在圈养鸟群中提供一系列选择伙伴和/或繁殖伴侣的机会。