St Charles Kaitlyn M, VanderWaal Kimberly L, Anderson Jon E, Johnston Lee J, Li Yuzhi Z
Department of Animal Science, College of Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Sep 27;11:1441813. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1441813. eCollection 2024.
Tail biting is a multifactorial behavior that causes welfare and economic challenges in swine production. As of 2024, research exploring the influence of pig social structure on the development of tail biting is limited. The objective of this study was to explore whether social structures of pigs from different litter origins can impact tail biting and, ultimately, tail damage. Pigs ( = 96) were grouped (eight pigs/pen) based on their litter origin: non-littermates (NLM), half-littermates, and littermates (LM). Tail injury scores were assessed twice weekly from 10 to 24 weeks of age, with a maximal tail injury score (MTS) over the study period being used to evaluate victimization by tail biting. Pig behavior was video-recorded at 15, 19, and 23 weeks of age. Association networks based on lying behavior and tail biting interaction networks were evaluated at pen-and pig-levels using social network analysis. Pigs in LM pens experienced higher median MTS compared to pigs in NLM pens (Median = 1.5; Interquartile range = 1-2; = 0.009). Within association networks, NLM pens had lower degree centralization measures than other pens at both 15 (Estimated marginal mean [EMM] = 0.07; 95% CI = 0.02-0.12; = 0.003) and 23 weeks (EMM = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.04-0.14; = 0.01) and pigs in NLM pens had higher weighted degree centrality than those in other pens (EMM = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90-1.11; = 0.002), suggesting pigs in NLM pens had more uniform, stronger, and more connections with their pen-mates. In tail biting networks, increased weighted in-degree centrality was associated with increased odds of pigs receiving a more severe MTS (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.08-2.27; = 0.02). Pigs with increased weighted out-degree centrality tended to have increased odds of receiving a more severe MTS (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.97-1.48; = 0.09). These preliminary data suggest a potential relationship between social structures and tail biting in growing-finishing pigs.
咬尾是一种多因素行为,会给养猪生产带来福利和经济方面的挑战。截至2024年,探索猪的社会结构对咬尾行为发展影响的研究有限。本研究的目的是探讨来自不同窝源的猪的社会结构是否会影响咬尾行为,并最终影响尾部损伤。将96头猪(每栏8头)根据其窝源进行分组:非同窝仔猪(NLM)、半同窝仔猪和同窝仔猪(LM)。从10周龄到24周龄,每周对尾部损伤评分进行两次评估,用研究期间的最大尾部损伤评分(MTS)来评估咬尾造成的受害情况。在15周、19周和23周龄时对猪的行为进行视频记录。使用社会网络分析在栏舍和猪的层面评估基于躺卧行为的关联网络和咬尾互动网络。与NLM栏舍中的猪相比,LM栏舍中的猪的MTS中位数更高(中位数 = 1.5;四分位间距 = 1 - 2;P = 0.009)。在关联网络中,NLM栏舍在15周龄(估计边际均值[EMM] = 0.07;95%置信区间 = 0.02 - 0.12;P = 0.003)和23周龄时(EMM = 0.09;95%置信区间 = 0.04 - 0.14;P = 0.01)的度数中心性集中度均低于其他栏舍,且NLM栏舍中的猪的加权度数中心性高于其他栏舍中的猪(EMM = 1.00;95%置信区间 = 0.90 - 1.11;P = 0.002),这表明NLM栏舍中的猪与同栏伙伴的联系更均匀、更强且更多。在咬尾网络中,加权入度中心性增加与猪获得更严重MTS的几率增加相关(比值比[OR] = 1.56;95%置信区间 = 1.08 - 2.27;P = 0.02)。加权出度中心性增加的猪获得更严重MTS的几率往往也会增加(OR = 1.19;95%置信区间 = 0.97 - 1.48;P = 0.09)。这些初步数据表明生长育肥猪的社会结构与咬尾行为之间存在潜在关系。