• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impacts of mandated data collection on syringe distribution programs in the United States.强制数据收集对美国注射器分发项目的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr 4;79:102725. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102725.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to monitoring and evaluation at syringe service programs.注射器服务项目中监测和评估的促进因素和障碍。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 28;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01073-z.
2
Baseline prevalence and correlates of HIV and HCV infection among people who inject drugs accessing a syringe services program; Miami, FL.在接受注射毒品者服务计划的吸毒者中,艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染的基线流行率和相关因素;佛罗里达州迈阿密。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Jun 10;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00385-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Portapotty Experiment: Neoliberal approaches to the intertwined epidemics of opioid-related overdose and HIV/HCV, and why we need cultural anthropologists in the South Bronx.移动厕所实验:新自由主义应对阿片类药物相关过量用药与艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎交织流行的方法,以及为何我们需要南布朗克斯的文化人类学家
Dialect Anthropol. 2016 Dec;40(4):395-410. doi: 10.1007/s10624-016-9443-4. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Threading the Needle--How to Stop the HIV Outbreak in Rural Indiana.穿针引线——如何阻止印第安纳州农村地区的艾滋病毒疫情
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):397-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1507252. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
3
Consequences of a restrictive syringe exchange policy on utilisation patterns of a syringe exchange program in Baltimore, Maryland: Implications for HIV risk.马里兰州巴尔的摩市注射器交换政策限制对注射器交换项目使用模式的影响:对艾滋病毒风险的启示
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 Nov;34(6):637-44. doi: 10.1111/dar.12276. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
4
Beyond NIMBYism: understanding community antipathy toward needle distribution services.超越邻避主义:理解社区对针头分发服务的反感
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 May;25(3):624-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Do needle syringe programs reduce HIV infection among injecting drug users: a comprehensive review of the international evidence.针头注射器项目能否减少注射吸毒者中的艾滋病毒感染:对国际证据的全面综述
Subst Use Misuse. 2006;41(6-7):777-813. doi: 10.1080/10826080600669579.

强制数据收集对美国注射器分发项目的影响。

Impacts of mandated data collection on syringe distribution programs in the United States.

作者信息

Davidson Peter, Chakrabarti Priya, Marquesen Michael

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, United States.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr 4;79:102725. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102725.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102725
PMID:32259770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308185/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Syringe Distribution Programs (SDPs) are a well-proven public health response to the spread of HIV and other blood borne illnesses among people who inject drugs. Many SDPs in the United States are required to collect data from service users as a condition of either legal authorization to operate or as a condition of funding. We sought to describe the prevalence of such externally mandated data collection and impact on service delivery at syringe distribution programs (SDPs) in the United States via an online survey.

METHODS

Online survey of SDPs in the US.

RESULTS

63 SDPs participated. 95•2% collected data about individual service users, with 76•7% being mandated to do so by an external entity as a condition of legal authorization, and/or as a condition of funding. Only 21•7% of mandated respondents received any report back on how data was used. 60•0% reported that data collection acted as a barrier to providing syringes to people who use drugs due to service user fears about loss of anonymity and/or law enforcement. 33•3% reported that the computer literacy and language skills required to collect data meant otherwise appropriate members of the community could not he hired as staff or volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Data collection at SDPs may act as a barrier to service provision to populations at high risk for HIV and other blood born viruses, and place considerable logistic burdens on often under-resourced public health programs. Further, it is often unclear to SDPs what purpose their data is being put to. We argue that to be ethical, the purpose of data collection should be carefully considered and regularly reviewed to ensure data is being put to meaningful purpose which is commensurate with impacts on service delivery.

摘要

目标

注射器分发项目(SDPs)是一种经过充分验证的公共卫生应对措施,用于应对艾滋病毒和其他血源性疾病在注射吸毒人群中的传播。美国的许多注射器分发项目被要求收集服务使用者的数据,这是其获得合法运营授权或获得资金的条件之一。我们试图通过一项在线调查来描述美国注射器分发项目中这种外部强制数据收集的普遍性及其对服务提供的影响。

方法

对美国的注射器分发项目进行在线调查。

结果

63个注射器分发项目参与了调查。95.2%的项目收集了关于个体服务使用者的数据,其中76.7%是受外部实体强制要求这样做的,作为合法授权和/或获得资金的条件。在被强制要求的受访者中,只有21.7%收到了关于数据使用情况的任何反馈报告。60.0%的项目报告称,由于服务使用者担心失去匿名性和/或执法问题,数据收集成为向吸毒者提供注射器的障碍。33.3%的项目报告称,收集数据所需的计算机技能和语言技能意味着社区中其他合适的成员无法被聘为工作人员或志愿者。

结论

注射器分发项目的数据收集可能成为向艾滋病毒和其他血源性病毒高危人群提供服务的障碍,并给资源往往不足的公共卫生项目带来相当大的后勤负担。此外,注射器分发项目通常不清楚其数据被用于何种目的。我们认为,从伦理角度出发,应仔细考虑并定期审查数据收集的目的,以确保数据被用于有意义的目的,且与对服务提供的影响相称。