Baba T, Matsushima T, Fukui M, Hasuo K, Yasumori K, Masuda K, Kuromatsu C
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University.
No Shinkei Geka. 1988 Nov;16(12):1355-62.
Relationship between angiographical manifestations and operative findings of hemifacial spasm was studied in 100 cases. Vertebral angiography was performed, and Towne, straight AP, and lateral projections were routinely studied. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) directly compressed the facial nerve root exit zone in 54 instances, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 38, and the vertebral artery (VA) in 11. Compressions by multiple vessels were observed in 3 cases. Anatomical variations of the AICA and the PICA were classified into 3 groups according to their origins and their distributions of blood supply: Type I, normal distribution of AICA and PICA; Type II, common trunk anomaly with dominant AICA (basilar artery origin); and Type III, common trunk anomaly with dominant PICA (vertebral artery origin). In our cases, 35% of them showed normal distribution, 34% dominant AICA, and 35% dominant PICA. Analyses of the angiograms revealed significantly increased numbers of common trunk anomalies when compared with normal angiograms studied by Takahashi. In 60 of the 65 cases with common trunk anomalies, facial nerves were compressed by the main trunk or the branches of the dominant artery. There were 35 cases which belonged to Type I anatomical classification. They were subdivided into 2 groups according to the size of the AICA and PICA: 1. AICA greater than PICA, and, 2. PICA greater than AICA. In the AICA greater than PICA subgroup, the AICA was the offending artery in all but one case. In the PICA greater than AICA subgroup, the PICA was responsible in 9 of 17 cases. In 31 cases, angiograms showed a redundant VA with lateral elongation into the cerebellopontine angle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对100例半面痉挛患者的血管造影表现与手术结果之间的关系进行了研究。进行了椎动脉造影,并常规研究Towne位、前后位和侧位投影。54例患者的小脑前下动脉(AICA)直接压迫面神经根部出口区,38例为小脑后下动脉(PICA),11例为椎动脉(VA)。3例观察到多支血管压迫。根据AICA和PICA的起源及其血供分布,将其解剖变异分为3组:I型,AICA和PICA分布正常;II型,以AICA为主的共干异常(基底动脉起源);III型,以PICA为主的共干异常(椎动脉起源)。在我们的病例中,35%表现为正常分布,34%为AICA占优势,35%为PICA占优势。血管造影分析显示,与高桥研究的正常血管造影相比,共干异常的数量显著增加。在65例共干异常的病例中,60例面神经被优势动脉的主干或分支压迫。有35例属于I型解剖分类。根据AICA和PICA的大小将它们分为2组:1. AICA大于PICA;2. PICA大于AICA。在AICA大于PICA的亚组中,除1例以外,所有病例中AICA均为肇事动脉。在PICA大于AICA的亚组中,17例中有9例责任血管为PICA。31例血管造影显示椎动脉迂曲并向外侧延伸至桥小脑角。(摘要截断于250字)