Michelogiannakis D, Javed F, Vastardis H
Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Jun;21(3):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00521-1. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
To review currently available evidence regarding the use of mini-screw implant (MSI)-supported pontics for the transitional management of missing permanent maxillary lateral incisors in children and adolescents.
Indexed databases were searched until October 2019. The following inclusion criteria were imposed: (a) children and adolescents with missing permanent maxillary lateral incisor/s; (b) temporary replacement of missing permanent maxillary lateral incisors with MSI-supported pontics; (c) clinical and radiographic assessment of the outcome [MSI stability and/or alveolar bone (ALB) development]; and (d) follow-up after pontic placement. Commentaries, letters to the Editor, reviews, and studies in adult patients and/or patients with systemic/genetic diseases, with no follow-up, and without clinical and radiographic assessment of the outcome were excluded.
Six out of 225 initially-identified studies were included. All studies were case-reports/series. A variability was observed among studies-assessed regarding the treatment protocol such as in the MSI dimensions, loading time and pontic retention protocol. Results from the included studies indicate that the MSI-supported pontics remained stable, with no infraocclusion and angular bony defect formation, ALB levels and bone density were maintained, and there was vertical ALB development during the follow-up period which ranged up to 99 months. Reported complications included MSI loss due to mobility, crown repair/replacement due to discoloration, and gingival impingement.
The limited evidence shows that MSI-supported pontics are useful transitional restorations for missing permanent maxillary lateral incisors in children and adolescents; however, further well-designed clinical trials are needed in this regard.
回顾目前关于使用微型螺钉种植体(MSI)支持的桥体对儿童和青少年上颌恒侧切牙缺失进行过渡性管理的现有证据。
检索截至2019年10月的索引数据库。采用以下纳入标准:(a)上颌恒侧切牙缺失的儿童和青少年;(b)用MSI支持的桥体临时替代缺失的上颌恒侧切牙;(c)对结果进行临床和影像学评估[MSI稳定性和/或牙槽骨(ALB)发育];(d)桥体放置后的随访。排除评论、致编辑的信、综述以及针对成年患者和/或患有全身性/遗传性疾病患者的研究,这些研究没有随访,也没有对结果进行临床和影像学评估。
最初识别的225项研究中有6项被纳入。所有研究均为病例报告/系列研究。在所评估的研究中,在治疗方案方面存在差异,例如MSI尺寸、加载时间和桥体固位方案。纳入研究的结果表明,MSI支持的桥体保持稳定,没有咬合过低和角形骨缺损形成,ALB水平和骨密度得以维持,并且在长达99个月的随访期内有牙槽骨垂直发育。报告的并发症包括因松动导致的MSI丢失、因变色导致的冠修复/更换以及牙龈压迫。
有限的证据表明,MSI支持的桥体是儿童和青少年上颌恒侧切牙缺失的有用过渡性修复体;然而,在这方面需要进一步设计良好的临床试验。