Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ob/Gyn and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;31(3):e21. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e21. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
The utility of adjuvant therapy for women with uterine confined leiomyosarcoma remains uncertain. We sought to identify trends, analyze efficacy, and assess survival impact of adjuvant therapy in this patients.
We performed an observational cohort study of 1030 women with early stage leiomyosarcoma from the 2008-2014 National Cancer Database. Multi-nominal logistic regression was used to identify trends in receipt of adjuvant treatment. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival.
There were 547 who (53.1%) received observation, 79 (7.7%) received radiation alone, 340 (33.0%) received chemotherapy alone, and 64 (6.2%) received chemoradiation. Patients were more likely to be observed if tumor size was <5 cm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.95-0.99; p=0.017) and less likely to be observed if lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was present (HR=0.60; 95% CI=0.41-0.89; p=0.010). Patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they were younger (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.65-0.94; p=0.010) and if they had LVSI (HR=1.47; 95% CI=1.01-2.16; p=0.040). There was an independent association between older age, tumor size >5 cm, and LVSI with worsened survival, with the strongest predictor of mortality being the presence of LVSI. With a median survival of 61.9 months, there was no difference in estimated overall survival at 1 and 3 years based on receipt of adjuvant treatment as compared to observation (p=0.500).
Although women with uterine confined leiomyosarcoma experience high recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes, adjuvant treatment does not appear to confer a survival benefit.
辅助治疗对子宫局限性平滑肌肉瘤患者的作用仍不确定。我们旨在确定该患者辅助治疗的趋势,分析疗效并评估其对生存的影响。
我们对 2008-2014 年国家癌症数据库中的 1030 例早期平滑肌肉瘤患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。采用多项逻辑回归来确定辅助治疗的接受趋势。比较了人口统计学和临床特征。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线估计生存情况。
有 547 名患者(53.1%)接受了观察治疗,79 名患者(7.7%)接受了单独放疗,340 名患者(33.0%)接受了单独化疗,64 名患者(6.2%)接受了放化疗。如果肿瘤大小<5cm(风险比[HR]=0.97;95%置信区间[CI]=0.95-0.99;p=0.017),患者更有可能接受观察治疗,如果存在血管淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)(HR=0.60;95%CI=0.41-0.89;p=0.010),则不太可能接受观察治疗。如果患者较年轻(HR=0.78;95%CI=0.65-0.94;p=0.010)且存在 LVSI(HR=1.47;95%CI=1.01-2.16;p=0.040),则更有可能接受化疗。年龄较大,肿瘤大小>5cm 和 LVSI 与生存恶化独立相关,而 LVSI 是死亡率的最强预测因素。中位生存期为 61.9 个月,与观察治疗相比,接受辅助治疗的患者 1 年和 3 年的总生存率无差异(p=0.500)。
尽管子宫局限性平滑肌肉瘤患者复发率高且生存结局差,但辅助治疗似乎并未带来生存获益。