Hsu Ying-Shuo, Chen Tien-Yu, Wu Dean, Lin Chia-Mo, Juang Jer-Nan, Liu Wen-Te
Department of Otolaryngology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Jul 15;16(7):1149-1160. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8462.
People with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remain undiagnosed because of the lack of easy and comfortable screening tools. Through this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of chest wall motion and cyclic variation of heart rate (CVHR) in detecting OSA by using a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) patch with a 3-axis accelerometer.
In total, 119 patients who snore simultaneously underwent polysomnography with a single-lead ECG patch. Signals of chest wall motion and CVHR from the single-lead ECG patch were collected. The chest effort index (CEI) was calculated using the chest wall motion recorded by a 3-axis accelerometer in the device. The ability of CEI and CVHR indices in diagnosing moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15) was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) by using the DeLong test.
CVHR detected moderate-to-severe OSA with 52.9% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity (AUC: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.84, optimal cutoff: 21.2 events/h). By contrast, CEI identified moderate-to-severe OSA with 80% sensitivity and 79.4% specificity (AUC: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.94, optimal cutoff: 7.1 events/h). CEI significantly outperformed CVHR regarding the discrimination ability for moderate-to-severe OSA (ΔAUC: 0.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.009-0.21, P = .032). For determining severe OSA, the performance of discrimination ability was greater (AUC = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.95) when combining these two signals.
Both CEI and CVHR recorded from a patch-type device with ECG and a 3-axis accelerometer can be used to detect moderate-to-severe OSA. Thus, incorporation of CEI is helpful in the detection of sleep apnea by using a single-lead ECG with a 3-axis accelerometer.
由于缺乏简便舒适的筛查工具,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者仍未得到诊断。通过本研究,我们旨在比较使用带有三轴加速度计的单导联心电图(ECG)贴片检测OSA时胸壁运动和心率周期性变化(CVHR)的诊断准确性。
共有119名打鼾患者同时接受了使用单导联ECG贴片的多导睡眠图检查。收集来自单导联ECG贴片的胸壁运动和CVHR信号。使用设备中三轴加速度计记录的胸壁运动计算胸壁努力指数(CEI)。使用DeLong检验通过曲线下面积(AUC)比较CEI和CVHR指数诊断中度至重度OSA(呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15)的能力。
CVHR检测中度至重度OSA的灵敏度为52.9%,特异度为94.1%(AUC:0.76,95%置信区间:0.67 - 0.84,最佳截断值:21.2次/小时)。相比之下,CEI识别中度至重度OSA的灵敏度为80%,特异度为79.4%(AUC:0.87,95%置信区间:0.80 - 0.94,最佳截断值:7.1次/小时)。在中度至重度OSA的鉴别能力方面,CEI显著优于CVHR(ΔAUC:0.11,95%置信区间:0.009 - 0.21,P = 0.032)。对于确定重度OSA,将这两种信号结合时鉴别能力的表现更强(AUC = 0.90,95%置信区间:0.85 - 0.95)。
从带有ECG和三轴加速度计的贴片式设备记录的CEI和CVHR均可用于检测中度至重度OSA。因此,纳入CEI有助于使用带有三轴加速度计的单导联ECG检测睡眠呼吸暂停。