Sarkar Somwrita, Arcaute Elsa, Hatna Erez, Alizadeh Tooran, Searle Glen, Batty Michael
School of Architecture, Design, and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 18;7(3):191638. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191638. eCollection 2020 Mar.
We study the scaling of (i) numbers of workers and aggregate incomes by occupational categories against city size, and (ii) total incomes against numbers of workers in different occupations, across the functional metropolitan areas of Australia and the USA. The number of workers and aggregate incomes in specific high-income knowledge economy-related occupations and industries show increasing returns to scale by city size, showing that localization economies within particular industries account for superlinear effects. However, when total urban area incomes and/or gross domestic products are regressed using a generalized Cobb-Douglas function against the number of workers in different occupations as labour inputs, constant returns to scale in productivity against city size are observed. This implies that the urbanization economies at the whole city level show linear scaling or constant returns to scale. Furthermore, industrial and occupational organizations, not population size, largely explain the observed productivity variable. The results show that some very specific industries and occupations contribute to the observed overall superlinearity. The findings suggest that it is not just size but also that it is the diversity of specific intra-city organization of economic and social activity and physical infrastructure that should be used to understand urban scaling behaviours.
我们研究了(i)澳大利亚和美国各功能性大都市区内,按职业类别划分的工人数量和总收入相对于城市规模的缩放比例,以及(ii)不同职业中工人数量相对于总收入的缩放比例。特定高收入知识经济相关职业和行业的工人数量和总收入显示出随城市规模的规模收益递增,这表明特定行业内的本地化经济产生了超线性效应。然而,当使用广义柯布 - 道格拉斯函数将城市总收入和/或国内生产总值作为劳动投入对不同职业的工人数量进行回归时,会观察到生产力相对于城市规模呈现规模收益不变。这意味着整个城市层面的城市化经济呈现线性缩放或规模收益不变。此外,工业和职业组织,而非人口规模,在很大程度上解释了观察到的生产力变量。结果表明,一些非常特定的行业和职业导致了观察到的总体超线性。研究结果表明,理解城市缩放行为不仅应考虑规模,还应考虑城市内部经济和社会活动以及物理基础设施的特定组织多样性。