Ezzibdeh Rami M, Barrett Andrew A, Arora Prerna, Amanatullah Derek F
Orthopedics. 2020 Jul 1;43(4):e237-e243. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200404-05. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
Surgical learning curves are a representation of the number of cases required for a surgeon to reach a stable rate of outcomes and complications. In this study, the authors present the learning curve for the direct superior (DS) approach to total hip arthroplasty, which is a muscle-sparing modification to the mini-posterior technique. This was a retrospective analysis of the first 40 primary DS cases done by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into 2 groups of 20 and compared for intra- and postoperative complications, acetabular component positioning, and Harris Hip Score at 90 days after surgery. As a control, the first 20 primary mini-posterior cases were analyzed as the baseline performance of the surgeon and the DS approach. There was no statistically significant difference between the first and second sets of DS patients regarding Harris Hip Score, intraoperative complications, dislocations, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and components positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone. The only statistically significant difference between the first and second sets of DS cases was a decrease in operating time (P<.001). This suggests that the learning curve is less than 20 patients. The results also indicate that the first 20 DS cases ambulated farther (P=.007) and had a shorter length of stay (P=.007), outperforming the mini-posterior approach. This study suggests that the DS learning curve is short for surgeons trained in the posterior approach. The data could be especially pertinent as 90-day results and safety are becoming increasingly important in evaluating performance for bundled-payment models. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e237-e243.].
手术学习曲线代表外科医生达到稳定的手术效果和并发症发生率所需的病例数量。在本研究中,作者展示了全髋关节置换术直接前路(DS)入路的学习曲线,该入路是对微创后外侧技术的一种保留肌肉的改良术式。这是对一位外科医生完成的前40例初次DS手术病例的回顾性分析。这些病例被分为两组,每组20例,并比较两组的术中和术后并发症、髋臼假体位置以及术后90天的Harris髋关节评分。作为对照,分析了前20例初次微创后外侧手术病例,作为该外科医生和DS入路的基线表现。在Harris髋关节评分、术中并发症、脱位、估计失血量、住院时间以及假体位于Lewinnek安全区内方面,第一组和第二组DS患者之间无统计学显著差异。第一组和第二组DS病例之间唯一具有统计学显著差异的是手术时间缩短(P<0.001)。这表明学习曲线患者数少于20例。结果还表明,前20例DS病例行走距离更远(P = 0.007)且住院时间更短(P = 0.007),优于微创后外侧入路。本研究表明,对于接受过后路入路培训的外科医生而言,DS入路的学习曲线较短。随着90天结果和安全性在评估捆绑支付模式的手术表现中变得越来越重要,这些数据可能尤为相关。[《骨科学》。2020;43(4):e237 - e243。]